How To Be A Racist

The latest rant by Pat Condell




Click here if the video fails to load.

As if you didn't know.

Islamic law is adopted by British legal chiefs
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/relig...

Government intervenes at school taken over by Muslim radicals
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/relig...

Woman did not show her face at Heathrow airport
http://www.asianimage.co.uk/news/1104...

British schools where girls must wear the Islamic veil
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/...

Sharia courts "as consensual as rape"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/relig...

“Racist” redefined equals “Anti-Socialist”

Is the term “Socialist” a secret racist code-word for “Black”? Or are closet Socialists coming out of the woodwork seeking to ignite racial and class warfare? It would appear that any inflammatory word can be Socialist code for “Black”.

When Lewis Diuguid, of the Kansas City Star wrote his editorial, “Shame on McCain and Palin for using an old code word for black,” he ignited a fire-storm. Diuguid made the usual Socialist attempt to ignite racial conflict.

Millions of Americans, who rightly believe that Socialism is a gateway to Communism, were shocked to learn that the word, “Socialist” might be linked to the Black race.

Apparently, to Diuguid’s way of twisted thinking, socialism is linked to several valiant Black freedom fighters, some of whom were openly Socialist or Communist. For many Americans, who were born before 1960, the “communism scare” had nothing to do with the Black race and had everything to do with the spread of the wicked economic system of Communism from Russia and from Red China. As far as I know there are not that many Blacks in Russia or China.

Here’s what Stop the ACLU had to say:

Since most Americans are aware that socialism is not only misguided but evil — a form of systemized theft that punishes work and initiative while rewarding sloth and dependency, reducing the productive to government slaves and everyone else to farm animals bred for their votes — the fact that Obama is a Socialist stands among the most compelling reasons to resist the left-wing media’s push to install him in power. So on behalf of that very media, Lewis Diuguid of the Kansas City Star has declared that drawing attention to Obama being a Socialist is racist:

The indiscriminate use of a pejorative term, such as “racist” to label anyone who chooses to vote against Obama serves to not only water down the term itself, but to turn the term into a bad joke! It does a disservice to the many freedom fighters, be they Socialist, Communist or Capitalist, who fought against racial discrimination, and who knew what real racism was all about.

For the elitist Obamaniacs, who fully understand the difference between Socialism and Capitalism, the code word “racist” is a call to arms. It is a call to those Socialist followers of Obama who fear that Obama’s veil has been lifted at a most inopportune time. It’s also a perfect code word because it still has the power to marshal the majority of young Obama followers who fear racism, but who have little understanding of the impact that socialism will have on the United States.

Even The Guardian, not known as a bastion of right-wing thought, had this to say:

Liberal journalists are combing the back roads of America looking for evidence of the resurgent racism being generated by the prospect of a black man becoming president. The striking thing is how little they've turned up in a country of 300m people with plenty of racial conflict in its history. . .
Compared to the level of open anti-Catholic bias against John Kennedy in 1960, racism in the 2008 campaign is a dog that didn't bark.

For those who have failed to learn the lessons of history, it is important to note that “class struggle” is what socialism and communism is all about! Socialism cannot take hold in this country or any other country without continuous class or racial strife. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles, the fathers of Communism, wrote that the history of all society is the history of class struggle.

Let’s open our eyes to the vile Diuguids of this world, who would foment racial and class warfare just to get one man elected!

Technorati Tags: Lewis Diuguid,Kansas City Star,Socialism,Communism,racist,racism,code words,Barack Obama

Trackposted to third world county, DragonLady's World, Cao's Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

ACLU Caught Discriminating Against the Black Culture?

Boxer shorts, thongs, sagging pants, no underwear and no panty lines . . .

Yesterday, Atlanta city councilman C.T. Martin, who happens to be black, proposed an amendment to Atlanta’s indecency laws that would ban baggy pants that show boxer shorts or thongs. C.T. Martin, stated that sagging pants are an "epidemic" that is becoming a "major concern" around the country.

The proposed ordinance states that "the indecent exposure of his or her undergarments" would be unlawful in a public place. It would go in the same portion of the city code that outlaws sex in public and the exposure or fondling of genitals.

Naturally, the always vigilant race baiting specialists, the ACLU, jumped in to the issue. Debbie Seagraves, the white executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia, stated that the proposed ordinance would also bar women from showing the strap of a thong beneath their pants. They would also be prohibited from wearing jogging bras in public or show a bra strap.

Seagraves also said that the law could not be enforced because such a law would very likely be applied in a racially discriminatory manner, and the implication is that it could not be applied without discrimination because it targets something that came out of the black youth culture.

Hmmmmm??? Do we have a Gotcha???

Using the ACLU’s logic we could also assume that noise ordinances could never be enforced when music gets too loud because much of American music: Gospel, jazz, Blues, rock, hip-hop, etc. “came out of the black youth culture.” The ACLU places no time-limits on when any fad was actually developed or if it is still a culturally-based fad.

We know that low-riding pants have crossed into the youth of all races. And so has our American music no matter where it originally came from. But it would appear that the ACLU really wants to keep the black culture separate from the larger America pop culture. Sounds like discrimination by the white controlled ACLU to me. But until this issue is resolved, music lovers of Atlanta, blast away!!!

Apparently I’m not the only one to make the music connection or to see that the ACLU is actively using racial profiling to achieve its ends:

Classic Values wrote:

. . .I've seen plenty of white men and women wearing these stupid clothes. What does it mean to say that something "came out of the black culture?" That's awfully broad, and I think a number of assumptions are involved. Rock and roll came out of the black culture, so did disco, so did hip-hop, and so did rap. If loud music were prohibited after certain hours, and it could be shown that most loud music was one of these forms, would that constitute discrimination against something that "came out of the black culture"? Is Seagraves arguing that black people invented baggy pants, boxer shorts or bras? Or merely that they decided to wear them in certain ways? I'm old enough to remember when miniskirts first horrified the nation, but would it in any way be relevant to claim that they came out of "white culture" because they first appeared in England? . . .

MORE: In a more recent post, Jeff Goldstein explains why a white leftist like Debbie Seagraves does in fact have the unique right to castigate blacks with whom she disagrees . . .

C.T. Martin has the best of intentions but he’s got it all wrong. It isn’t really just about indecency.

It’s about the public health!

Last year while having breakfast in a local IHOP, we couldn’t help but notice that the white bus-boy was wearing his pants down to his thighs. His boxers were completely exposed as he brushed up against the tables to “clean” them! I was about to go to the manager to complain, but as luck would have it, the boy never returned into the dining area. If I had complained, would that have been racist???

Wait, don’t be so quick to say “No”. Let’s use the ACLU’s twisted logic

How did I know that the boy was white? We can‘t just go by appearances. He could have been racially mixed. Not only that, but he was wearing his pants in a way that showed solidarity with the black youth culture. So If I had complained that complaint could be assumed to be racist.

Underwear is meant to be worn under outer clothing. It serves to protect the outer garment from the traces of bodily fluid and excrement that would-be Hollywood types like to spread around. Guys and Gals, think about that the next time you try on or borrow jeans. When underwear becomes outerwear it is not only visually offensive, it exposes you and me to possible diseases.

In Great Britain last year they ran these public service ads:

The campaign features teenagers wearing underwear with the slogans: "I've got gonorrhea" and "I'll give you one". The TV ad, which will appear from 20 November, shows couples with the name of an STI displayed on clothes or jewellery. It aims to show that in real life such infections are not so easy to spot.

Isn’t it high-time for a panty lines fad? Perhaps someone will start a Panty Lines blog or blogroll?

Best one-liner
Its-jim wrote:

"It may be the only fad ever to have started in nursing homes and spread to the Y Generation!"

Atlanta
ACLU
Black Culture
sagging pants
boxer shorts
thongs
underwear

Related tags: georgia, news, politics, democrat, liberal, 1st amendment music, culture, racism, london, booty, panties, thong, butt, breasts, string, lingerie, panties, fashion, bra, men's underwear, men,

Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, http://morewhat.com/wordpress/?p=2265, Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, DeMediacratic Nation, Adam's Blog, The Uncooperative Radio Show!, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, Webloggin, The Bullwinkle Blog, CommonSenseAmerica, and Church and State, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Crimes Against Humanity: Deadly Denial

Originally posted at Maggie's Notebook

The Guardian's Claudia Webbe is clearly upset at Prime Minister Tony Blair's stance on, in Blair's words, the:

"...gang culture that is killing innocent young black kids...."

GuardianUnlimited reports that Blair is taking advantage of his last few days and weeks as Prime Minister. Blair admitted to:

"lurching into total frankness."

The PM directly addressed the citizenry calling:

"...on black people to lead the fight against knife crime."

Ms. Webbe characterized the citizenry as:

"...a willing audience of, mainly, white faces..."

Ms. Webbe does not affirm or deny that black children are dying at the hands of Black gangs. Instead, she refers to a report that says:

"...a significant minority of vulnerable children and young people, disproportionate numbers of whom are black, were suffering from negative outcomes and outputs and endure high levels of exclusions, and that service provision was not good enough."

So, Ms. Webbe does not deny that young, black children, as well as non-black children, are dying at the hands of gangs, or someone. Prime Minister Blair, as paraphrased by The Guardian, says that the spate of London murders

"was not being caused by poverty, but a distinctive black culture."

and...

He said people had to drop their political correctness and recognise that the violence would not be stopped:

"by pretending it is not young black kids doing it".

The Home Office Minister, Lady Scotland, disagrees with Blair and says the:

"...disproportionate number of black youths in the criminal justice system was a function of their disproportionate poverty, and not to do with a distinctive black culture.

So, is Lady Scotland saying that the murders are not due to Black gangs murdering Black children, as well as non-Black children?

Claudia Webbe says:

"The prime minister is wrong to assert or imply that this is a "black problem": the bullet does not discriminate in its effect, and neither is the black community responsible for the manufacture, supply and importation of dangerous weapons."

Ms. Webbe clearly does not deny or affirm that the gangs are comprised of those from the Black community. She blames the murders on the bullets, and not only that, she denies that Blacks work in the industries that may produce the bullets, the weapons - no one Black is to blame. She doesn't state that knives are at fault, or those working in industries which manufacturer knives.

This post is not about race; it is about denial; insert Hispanic Gang, White gang, Skin-head Gang, Islamic Jihad, Pro-Life terrorist, Pro-Abortion terrorist, Green Terrorist - they are all terrorists. To deny it is foolish and self-destructive.

To be fair to Ms. Webbe, she asserts that the Black Community has:

"...not been silent in its condemnation and fight against the UK's history of violence."

I have much empathy for those living in crime-ridden communities, with no way out, who have the gumption to stand-up and fight back, if only by persistently notifying authorities. It is not a desirable way of life - in fact, it is undeniably a nightmare. She points to a successful community program (apparently from 2000):

Operation Trident is a clear example of community mobilisation and our preparedness to stand up to the "men of violence".

The issue is, of course, who are the current men and/or women of violence? Are they Black gang members, White gang members, or is it Islamic terrorism? Come, come now, don't be a denier. In the here and now, around the world, it is also Islamic Jihad terrorism. In the streets of London at any given moment it may be some gang culture, of some color, Black, White or in between; and it is, assuredly, Islamic Jihad, as well. Ms. Webbe's heated characterization of Tony Blair's words, as well as the title of her article:

"A kick in the teeth"

is about one micro-enth, or less, of the intensity of my feelings, and the feelings of many others, about Islamic terrorism - as well as gang violence.

It is the deniers that allow the holocaust of whatever measure. Ms. Webbe asserts in the sub-heading of her article:

"The black community carries no blame for the violent crime that afflicts it - no matter what the prime minister says."

I, of course, have no first hand knowledge of gang culture in London. I do have a keen sense of words, however, and in hers I find no denial of the gang members, of which Blair spoke, being Black.

It's not about race or color, it's about crimes against humanity.

Permalink for this entry: http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2007/04/crimes-against-humanity-deadly-denial.html

Trackback URL for this entry:
http://haloscan.com/tb/txwise/998832799425016468

Technorati Tags: Prime Minister Tony Blair Britain England Gangs
Gang Culture Blacks African American Black Gangs Skin-heads Hispanic Gangs White Gangs Claudia Webbe The Guardian Guardian Unlimited
Racial Racist Politically Correct Racism

Update: Leftists Attempt to Close Down Newspaper Forum

The president of the Texas Minutemen, Shannon McGauley, (The Official Texas Chapter of the Minuteman Project) has joined the fray in what promises to put the Wise County Messenger Forum on the radar. I’ve seen other comments posted else where that say, “These little forum incidents aren’t such big deals because they happen all the time.”

My response to that kind of thinking is that every movement starts small. Every loss of our rights, especially the freedom of speech, starts small. If we allow leftist anarchists to defame anyone, anywhere, no matter how small and insignificant the incident, we have given in to forces that will one day overwhelm us all. It’s up to us folks, you and I, to step up to the plate and to refuse to allow anyone to call people who oppose illegal immigration “racists.”

I know you’ve heard this adage a million times: “Think Globally. Act Locally”. Most of the folks reading this blog are also bloggers. We all believe that just one voice does make a difference, otherwise we wouldn’t bother blogging. But have we become so involved in the blogosphere that we’ve forgotten where we actually live?

There are quite a few folks out there on the internet who are not yet familiar with the blogosphere. They still communicate, develop friendships, and form their ideas through groups and forums. This is especially true in rural America.

Check out the forums in your own neighborhood, in your own city, and see if you can do your small part to counter the voices that are trying to destroy the fiber of this nation!

Many thanks to Spree of Wake Up America who is holding down this fort in my absence. As I’ve written before, I don’t know what I would have done without her dedication to excellence and without her expert help. I also want to welcome Debbie of Right Truth, who has joined our list of contributors. You might note that Debbie was the runner-up for the Blogger Halo Award!

For background on this update, see yesterday’s post from Spree: Fairness for All: Part #2

Yesterday’s story was also cross-posted at Right Truth, and Wake Up America.


Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Is It Just Me?, Stuck On Stupid, Thought Alarm, Pursuing Holiness, 123 Beta, Rightwing Guy, The HILL Chronicles, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, stikNstein... has no mercy, Pirate's Cove, The Right Nation, Renaissance Blogger, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, The Random Yak, Adam's Blog, basil's blog, Conservative Cat, Wake Up America, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Faultline USA, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Diggers Realm, High Desert Wanderer, and thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Permalink to this post:
http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2007/01/update-leftists-attempt-to-close-down.html

Trackback link to this post:
http://haloscan.com/tb/txwise/6127879169288331871

UNCHECKED IMMIGRATION = NATIONAL BALKANIZATION: IS THIS AMERICA’S FUTURE?

OpenTrackback Weekend

Here’s a News-roundup You Will Not Likely Discover in the Mainstream Media

The Marxist Dominated Far Left Admits Pandering to Illegal Aliens
Here’s a hat-tip to Immigration Watchdog who shared this information. The following excerpt is from the Peoples Weekly World (a Communist publication). (Bold emphasis added by me to get your reading attention.)

Time to unite against Bush administration’s anti-immigrant ‘surge’
. . .In total, 186,600 immigrants were deported in 2006, a 12 percent increase over 2005’s 165,000. This is less than 2 percent of the 12 million undocumented, but it has sent a wave of anxiety through working-class immigrant communities.

The motives are obvious:
• Repression is a “logical” response to the massive marches for immigrant rights.
• A crackdown appeases the most racist right-wing elements like Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) who have been denouncing Bush as being soft on “illegal immigration,” and encourages the ultra-right base.
• Raids serve to pressure business and others into supporting a guest worker program. Threatened with loss of their cheap labor, companies will be eager to get Congress to replace it with guest workers who can be controlled and exploited “legally.” Meanwhile, the terrorization of immigrants by means of repression is part of a long-term trend to prevent them fighting for better wages and thus helps to amass profits through super-exploitation.
So, by means of stepped up repression, Bush thinks to keep the upper hand on the immigration issue, staving off attacks from left and right and controlling the direction of legislation.

This must be contested. We can not allow the 12 million undocumented immigrants in this country, and their millions of citizen and documented spouses and children (potential future voters), to be used as policy hostages by Bush. . . .

The League of United Latin American Citizens, the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials have united in calling for a moratorium on immigration raids and deportations. At Christmas, the American Friends Service Committee, along with the Labor Council on Latin American Affairs, the National Council of Latin American and Caribbean Communities and others, circulated a sign-on letter demanding such a moratorium, and dozens of national and local organizations added their names.

At the local and regional level, Centro Sin Fronteras and others in Chicago and the Midwest organized a 30,000-strong demonstration demanding a moratorium last July 19, and there have been a number of such protests in communities where raids have taken place. . .

To read the entire article, replace (dot) with a period. I don’t give free links to the far, far left and/or to Commies!
http://www(dot)pww(dot)org/article/view10367

In which country are Muslims being taught the following lessons?

Hat-tip to Crusade Media for this excerpt:

* "Everyone who does not embrace Islam is an unbeliever and must be called an unbeliever. . . . One who does not call the Jews and the Christians unbelievers is himself an unbeliever." *

"Whoever believes that churches are houses of God . . . or that what Jews and Christians do constitutes the worship of God . . . is an infidel."

* To offer greetings to a Christian at Christmas -- even to wish "Happy holidays" -- is "a practice more loathsome to God . . . than imbibing liquor, or murder, or fornication."

* Jews "are worse than donkeys." They are the corrupting force "behind materialism, bestiality, the destruction of the family, and the dissolution of society.

* Muslims who convert to another religion "should be killed because [they] have denied the Koran."

* Democracy is "responsible for all the horrible wars" of the 20th century, and for spreading "ignorance, moral decadence, and drugs."

If this sounds to you like the kind of fanaticism you might encounter in Saudi Arabia -- where the established creed is Wahhabism, an intolerant and extremist version of Islam -- you're right. Unfortunately, this religious hatred isn't confined to the Arabian peninsula. Thanks to the Saudi government's elaborate campaign to export Wahhabism worldwide, such anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-Western poison can also be found throughout the United States.

We know this from the work of Freedom House, a venerable human rights group that promotes democracy around the globe. In a new report, it documents the alarming degree to which Wahhabist propaganda has penetrated American mosques. . . .

It is important to note that most Muslims do not share the xenophobic Wahhabi dogma. Freedom House undertook its study in part because "many Muslims . . . requested our help in exposing Saudi extremism in the hope of freeing their communities from ideological strangulation." Now that Freedom House has done so, it is up to moderate American Muslims to purge their mosques of the Saudi toxin, and to ostracize the extremists in their midst.

Note: The Center for Religious Freedom was a self-sustaining division of Freedom House. Founded in 1941 by Eleanor Roosevelt and Wendell Willkie to oppose Nazism and Communism in Europe.

Freedom House and the Center for Religious Freedom Announce Separation
The Center for Religious Freedom, which for the past ten years has functioned as a part of Freedom House, will move to the Hudson Institute on December 31, 2006. At a meeting of the Freedom House Board of Trustees in New York City on October 26, a formal resolution was adopted clearing the way for the transfer of assets and liabilities.

AMERICANS VOTE “NO CONFIDENCE” ON U.N.
A majority of Americans (57%) now believe the United Nations should be scrapped and replaced if it cannot be reformed and made more effective. That result is from an extensive national benchmark survey about the UN on the 5th anniversary of 9/11, conducted by Luntz Maslansky Strategic Research.

Year of the Dhimmi

Here’s an excerpt:

. . .The mainstream media have by and large already capitulated to Islamic dhimmitude. Most have banned the use of the word "terrorist."

Some even refuse to mention Islam when reporting terrorism-related arrests. When Canadian authorities broke up a terrorist ring earlier this year, the Toronto Star lamented that fact the suspects were, "from all walks of Canadian life, with no apparent connection to one another." . . .

Note: Dhimmi are the subjugated Christians Jews and other non-Muslims living in Muslim lands.

Hate Crimes

FBI’s 2005 statistics: “When it comes to hate crimes involving religion, Jews are the victims nearly 70 percent of the time.”

Unchecked Immigration = National Balkanization
Is this America’s Future?

(Here's a couple of news items from the UK)

Muslims 'should get special health care'
Muslims should be provided with faithbased services - including male circumcision - on the NHS, says one healthcare expert.
Professor Aziz Sheikh is also calling for women patients to see same-sex medics, better access to prayer facilities in hospitals and more information so Muslims can avoid alcohol and pig-derived drugs. . .

Read More

Bank to woo Polish immigrants with bilingual branches
Banking giant Lloyds-TSB is to convert a number of branches to offer specialist services for Britain's fast-growing Polish community.

In a UK first, the branches will have signs, brochures and account opening forms in Polish. Dubbed 'international finance superstores', they will offer services both to existing British customers and a wide range of nationalities.
However, the main focus will be to serve the thousands of Polish workers who have jobs in this country over the past two years. . . .

Read More

The End of Deterrence
This article originally appeared in the January 11, 2007, Weekly Standard online.
January 11, 2007 by S. Enders Wimbush

If President Bush is persuaded by the Iraq Study Group to speak directly with Iran, he will be under strong pressure to cut a deal that makes Iran a significant partner in salvaging, at least temporarily, the mess in Iraq. For its quid pro quo in aiding America to come up with a face saving exit strategy, Iran will insist on a free hand to develop its "peaceful" nuclear power. One can almost hear the inevitable claims by those seeking to justify the president's giving ground on this issue. A nuclear Iran can be "managed" or deterred, we will hear; moreover, this is a good trade-off for extricating America from Iraq. President Bush should not be taken in. He must reject even the hint of compromise. . . .

Read More:



Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson's Website, The Random Yak, Big Dog's Weblog, Right Truth, basil's blog, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, 123 Beta, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, Dumb Ox News, High Desert Wanderer, Right Voices, and thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Permalink for this entry:
http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2007/01/unchecked-immigration-national.html

Trackback URL for this entry:
http://haloscan.com/tb/txwise/5951974398558057890