Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Robert De Niro from Raging Bull to Ranting Bull

Robert De Niro from Raging Bull to Ranting Bull

Great actors many times exceed their own abilities when they attempt to parse words outside those that were scripted for them. Robert De Niro is such an individual. Undoubtably one of the best actors of our generation has gone off the deep end when projecting his hate for President Trump. In his first rant I heard Mr. De Niro threaten the President with physical violence. His second attempt at condemnation of the Oval Office resident challenged the President on Climate Change. With Mr. De Niro’s limited education and or experience in the sciences he does not supply his rationale for the basis of his views on Climate Change. Yet his own way of life may threaten the climate by leaving an exponentially larger carbon footprint behind than the average person. Huge estates, private planes, limousines and more require much larger expenditures of energy than most “ordinary” people utilize. As a mouth piece for the left Mr. De Niro needs to sharpen his thoughts and articulate his arguments better. From this perch he is attempting to fly without wings.

Mark Davis MD

Friday, February 16, 2018

Harrisco: A Predatory Company

Harrisco: A Predatory Company

In brief I was hired by Harrisco (a South Korean company) to edit science and medical articles that were written by Asian professionals, mostly South Koreans. The English was rough and needed intense editing. A plentiful number of papers were downloaded to me. I did not receive any criticism from them while the editing process moved forward. After editing 67 journal articles I requested payment. The friendly interaction from them now turned dark. I became the worst editor on the planet for merely asking for payment due. I will not harp on the negativity aimed at me only to state they had no intention of paying me. If I had done a net search of this predatory company dozens of complaints, similar to mine, would have been discovered. Harrisco seeks English editors, advertises on Craigslist and other sites, snares them with promises and even a limited contract then cuts you down when you request your money. After multiple negative exchanges and the threat that I would inform the South Korean embassy, not far from my home, they relented and paid me a partial payment. Harrisco continues to owe me for 13 files. Harrisco has a minor profile on LinkedIn. I never met dishonorable South Koreans until I fell into the clutches of these misfits. Advice: stay away from this company because it is not worth the headache, the effort and or lack of compensation that goes with this job.

Mark Davis MD

In the event you need editing for science/medical journal articles and books

please contact me: scienceandmedicaljournalediting.com  or platomd@gmail.com

Saturday, February 03, 2018

Science and Medical Journal Editing

Science and medical journal articles require intense attention to detail to create the best paper possible. Non science and medical editors may be good for other fields of endeavor, yet for science and medically written works an editor in the field of science and medicine will provide the best outcome possible. Dr. Mark Davis has edited thousands of medical and science articles over many years. These articles have been published in the most prestigious journals in their respective fields. As a physician/scientist Dr. Davis has an intricate knowledge of the subjects in which he reviews. This experience allows for the best edited outcome possible. Use an editor who is well published himself and has been engaged by some of the best in their fields to edit their excellent works. Dr. Davis can be reached at: platomd@gmail.com        


Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Democracy versus Democrats

Democracy versus Democrats

Democracy is an outgrowth of natural law. There are those in society that believe general populations should be controlled in some manner or format. These are the Demons of Democracy. In the United States we call them Democrats, ironically they have a similar sounding name. These self-serving individuals displayed their true nature by shutting down the country on 1/22/2018, placing illegals above the citizenry of this country. To maintain our freedoms we must be ever vigilant that forces exist which want to take it from us.

Sunday, January 21, 2018

Public Information Request to the Maryland Board of Physicians Drop Dead

Public Information Request to the Maryland Board of Physicians Drop Dead

Marylander’s have lost control of their government. Administrative agencies, exemplified by the Maryland Board of Physicians, hide behind carefully crafted regulations enabling these public entities to keep their perversions and malicious behaviors hidden from the public. Reminiscent of pre Glasnost days, before the Soviet empire tumbled, physicians requesting information on hearings and administrative assaults from this corrupt entity, meet a stone wall when making a Public Information Access Request. Citing lawyer-client privilege, immunity, exemptions from state law and more the Board of Physicians disables physicians’ lives, at will, then jumps behind a veil of secrecy. Most recently this physician requested records from the Board of Physicians, for a bogus hearing he participated in during the month of December in 2016, the reply in legalese: Drop Dead.

Lawyers employed by Maryland Attorney General’s Office run cover for Board of Physicians’ members. To protect themselves the Medical Board engages these lawyers to perform two tasks: First, prosecute the maximum number of physicians they can to keep their sanction numbers high and secondly to protect themselves when physicians seek redress from their illicit actions.  When a Maryland physician’s career is injured or terminated by the corrupt Board of Physicians, this administrative entity encourages doctors to take them to court. Why? In the greatest majority of cases Maryland’s left leaning courts side with their administrative departments, no matter where the facts fall. This Board cares little about facts only results. A few physicians thrown under the proverbial rug, who cares.

The Soviet Union has been gone for nearly 3 decades, yet its corrupt Star Chamber type tactics still survive. Maryland has adopted these processes within the structure of its regulations to suppress any rebuke it receives from a citizen. The laws of Maryland give preferences to some while others meet blunt force authoritarianism. Maryland’s complex legal system buries many. Some, like myself, just refuse to roll over and play dead. The next chapter will play out soon on a legal battlefield.

Mark Davis MD

platomd@gmail.com    medicalboardusa.com

Thursday, January 18, 2018

The Fat Zone 21st Century Dieting versus Fad Diets

                          The Fat Zone 21st Century Diet versus Fad Diets

The results of fad diets can be seen all over the streets of America. People who listened and followed an array of diets that promised rapid weight loss simultaneously offering the dieter the most delicious foods money can buy. The commercials are endless. Pastas, pizzas and pies move passed the viewers’ eyes as these well-polished commercials suck you in. The aging host or hostess claims weight loss of 20, 30 or even 50 pounds caused by an array of unhealthy foods. Perhaps the authors of these commercials believe the public at large are idiots. Sadly in many cases they may be correct. Millions perhaps billions are spent yearly on these fad diets, yet America is as obese as ever.

Enter The Fat Zone 21st Century Dieting. The diet menus in this e-book are healthy, delicious and very nutritious. Most of all weight loss occurs at an accelerated rate. There are no expensive prepared foods to buy. The menus in The Fat Zone offer the dieter major variations in foods allowing people to select healthy foods yet reduce weight because of the manner in which the diet is constructed. Before your purchase you next diet from a television commercial check out The Fat Zone 21st Century Dieting. The program more doctors and nutritionists are recommending.

Mark Davis MD

Sold by all e-book retailers

Monday, January 15, 2018

Obama's so called "Net Neutrality" was a Big Fat Lie. Not Neutral at all.

Net Neutrality is a horrible law. Look past all the leftwing screaming and the death threats, the end isn’t coming; yes, humans will die, but not because of ending Net Neutrality. The law is flawed, clearly biased; it gives distinct advantage and power to an exclusive segment of the Internet industry, what is called the “edge” providers.  Google, Facebook, Twitter, you get the picture.

Know this; Net Neutrality is not neutral; it is not neutral at all.  It is a reasonable argument that the choice of its name was a tactical lie. And the masses of ignorant Americans, led by a shallow and often times worthless press, lapped it up.

In my informal surveys I find very few people that have a clue what Net Neutrality is all about; most articles I’ve read in the mainstream press are superficial and talk generalities in ways that support the lie of neutrality.  It’s pathetic.

Where to Start
Proponents of Net Neutrality talk about protecting against “throttling” and blocking and censorship. But they stop there, by an large they don’t explain any details, I will.

Blocking and Censorship
First off, I agree, blocking and censorship are big concerns, very big concerns. These are fundamental. Corporations do not have the right to usurp the principles of our country. They do not have the right to censor or control the subjects of open forum content.    … Hear, Hear! Human rights exceed corporate objectives and interests, always.  That’s how I see it.  

That said, the throttling issue is way over hyped, Wow, just think a little past the basics here. Why wouldn’t I want the opportunity to trade speed for cost? Why is that so important? It’s not! This is mass propaganda, likely from the leftwing tech giants.  It’s over hyped and incredibly effective brainwashing. To witness such stellar mind control is scary to anyone that uses his or her brain. 
Misunderstood and poorly considered by many people (almost everyone I’ve asked). As far s I am concerned, the idea of controlling speed or providing preferential speed from the ISP is not a big concern. It wasn't to people back in 2015 when the rules went into effect either.  So why is it such a big concern now? Brainwashing, that is all.

So let’s get to the details of Net Neutrality, the details that matter.

Who was Governed by Net Neutrality?
The Internet is composed of two principle components the “access point” and the channels to content, called the “edge”. 

The access point is the business of “Internet Service Providers” or “ISPs”.  Large ISP's like Comcast and local service providers like Bend Broadband in Central Oregon, my ISP.

The other component of the Internet is the “edge” companies, where you land when you hit the Internet, Google for instance is my home page, That is the first edge of the internet for me. Twitter, Yahoo, Facebook. These are edge companies too, many others. 
As for principles of Net Neutrality Think about this, it’s all over the news. These companies have been known to censor, block, throttle and much worse. They can do so because Net Neutrality rules for the most part do not apply to them, only the ISPs are covered by the Net Neutrality regulations. That is wrong.

There it is the belly of the lie. It might come as a shock to you, after all these companies were such vocal supporters of the law.

They lie, they cheat, they deceive, they manipulate, they use psyops tactics to manage you. What more do the techno corporatist  have to do to get you to stop listening to them?

Think Outside The google 

This is what is relevant, who is and who is not governed; others will talk about Title Two and the Communications Act of 1934 bla bla. Bla. It is all smoke, irrelevant smoke. The idea that the Internet be governed by laws that originated 85 years ago is fodder for fools. 

The Internet needs to be looked at for what it is, now in todays world with an eye towards tomorrow’s potential. Getting hung up on what laws from the past should apply indicates you’re dealing with the wrong people. We must stop the thinking of the past and reanalyze the methods of the past. 

Future Planning
I believe that the Internet does need to be regulated; but there is no immediate rush, just as there wasn’t anything pressing back in 2015 when Net Neutrality was imposed. A measured reasoned and fair set of rules applied to all would not be detrimental in my opinion. Speed options with competitive pricing would be great too.  

Unfair, unbalanced and patently biased, the old Net Neutrality rules, that is bad, bad for the Internet and for society future itself. 

Regulations must be done in an even handed way. Full transparency is possible today and the society should have access to these discussions. The full light of day will keep the fascists away.