Showing posts with label New York. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York. Show all posts

Thursday, November 06, 2014

New Jersey; It's You People, Stupid. New Jersey is a poster Child for Liberal Failure.

UPDATE APRIL 12, 2016: BAD NEWS CONTINUES American Legislative Exchange Council's 9th Addition of Rich States Poor States shows New Jersey continues to help hold down the bottom of the list this year declining to 48th worst state. A pitiful performance from what once was a great state. Destroyed by decades of leftwing lies and liberal ignorance. LINK - American Legislative Exchange Council's 9th Addition ------ PREVIOUS: This article published first in 2014 but it still applies - New Jersey people, you should be embarrassed. More bad news for New Jersey, again ranked as one of the highest taxed and worst performing economies in the nation according to the Tax Foundation study released last month. Add to that  the mounting evidence outward migration is increasing. Continuing decline is in your tarot cards.

My most recent U-Haul rate study indicates it is 3.86 times more expensive to leave New Jersey for Austin Texas than it is to go to New Jersey from Austin Texas. Nearly 4 time more expensive getting out than getting in. What's that tell you?

That is a 53% increase in the U-Haul costs from this same time last year.

Granted, it is not a scientific study, all the same, people are leaving New Jersey at a staggering rate. I have run this study 2 times a year for the past 4 years. It has never been this bad.  In fact it has been fairly stable at a 2.5 times ratio for the past two years right up through June 2014 when I ran the study last. Since then we see this jump, a spike in getting the hell out.



 The study though not scientific is a fair indication of the effects of supply and demand. It focuses on the U-Haul rates to and from Austin Texas and several key areas, Northern California, Chicago, Illinois and Wayne, New Jersey.  Three areas ranked as having excessive regulatory and anti business climates.

Is it just the high taxes and regulatory climate?  No, I don't think so, New Jersey has lots going against it in addition to high taxes. For one thing there is a crooked croniness in NJ, an embedded corruption that permeates the society. Northern New Jersey where I went to High School has developed a culture of "Me, Me, Me". A selfish, ignorant callousness of much of the population combined with an intellectual laziness. That narcissistic culture is particularly annoying, people just didn't care about anything outside their self-centered personal worlds.

It is ironic that the generation of peace and love that grew out of the 60s and 70s has become the generation of "I don't care...it's all about Me, Me, Me".

It is this self absorption on steroids that undermines the sense of community that is now it is coming home to roust.

Why do I dwell on this issue, New Jersey the poster child of liberal failure?

There is an old adage; you can not fix a problem unless you identify the problem. In decades of civic involvement  in Chambers of Commerce and in other 'quasi' government organizations I've seen and experienced  repeated patterns. The same situation plays out over and over again.   Critical social problems are obfuscated and faux efforts at solutions deployed. It's an organized, intentional form of social insanity.  If you continue to  do the same thing over and over again and expect different results - we all have heard it, that is insanity.  

Back to the old adage, you can not fix a problem unless you identify the problem. The problem is the intentional efforts of the progressive leadership.  The culture that grows from progressive liberalism which I think many of us believe is the center of New Jersey's and much of America's problems. That is why I dwell on it. The problem is the type of people that lead areas like New Jersey and Northern California and Urban Illinois. It's the people, Stupid.

When you create a society that is blinded to itself it is easy to control that society and that is what progressives have done to the people of New Jersey and much of liberal America. Progressives have transferred the responsibility of awareness from the people and replaced it with a sense of entitlement. With the entitlement there is little reason to think beyond ones self interest hence the perspective of "whats in it for me?" Progressive liberals campaign on that premise and the self absorberd buy it. . .

If you want to fix this problem you have to call it out, you have to point the finger of blame, you have to put the cause on notice. It's the people, stupid.

Simple answer: If you don't want their fate, don't do what they do.

That is why I dwell on it. I want the people causing the problem to be spotlighted for what they are.

It's the liberals, Stupid.

Tuesday, October 07, 2014

A 4 year old dies; America's first death from the 'Mystery Disease' occurs in New Jersey; Locals couldn't care less.

A four year old preschooler died in New Jersey and no one seems to care much. Sure there was the basic "I feel so bad for the parents" type of response but not much depth. Shuffled off the digital page as fast as a day. IN the end the interest level and compassion was little more than drivel from the mass uninformed.

Ignorance is Bliss

New Jersey a center of American Decay
The masses ignored the issues and circumstances of his death. The "mystery Disease; The only "mystery" about this disease is why the main stream news  media and CDC keep calling it a mystery.

Since his death 3 more children have died and over a dozen are experiencing paralysis in the Denver area alone. The CDC and main stream media continue with the "Mystery Disease" talk. They lowered the coverage to - 'nothing new here, now move along, move along' and the New Jersey sheep do so in all their blissiness.

Devolution 

New Jersey and much of the poorly educated young culture today had devolved into the most uncaring society.  Yesterday's hippies, the generation that 'cared' has turned into the generation of  unaware and 'don't bother me about it'.

How a people can say that it is compassionate and caring when most of you can't even take the time to know what is going on... about anything.  A miserable generation of self absorbed destined to be a failure.  America as I see it needs a good dose of kick in the ass.

Champion the doers and the makers

Champion the doers, attack the plutocrats and the welfare ding bats. both ends need a haircut.   Start with kickin' some banker butt ... click for video and some Zeppelin too.
http://youtu.be/MoMHtw6y7oA?list=UUoBaq0m2vVhi8YASWO3jSUA


Saturday, February 09, 2013

New York State Non-Compliance Resistance to the NY Safe Act Arms Bill

Link to video (full 33 minute version) from January 29, 2013 Q&A forum

From YouTube:

"Residents of Erie County, New York overflow the State's dictating / Q & A forum concerning the
unconstitutional NY Safe Act arms bill.

The passion and anger from the people is evident of Erie County resistance.

After the first speaker spoke, the second one was introduced. A request from an audience member to
recite the Pledge of Allegiance was ignored by theState. So the people took over and assertively
recited it anyway.

The State attempted to have private interviews with the media which alienated the crowd further, who
then demanded transparency. Then the State wanted the questions from the audience to be private, which riled folks even more.

Questions asked by Western New Yorkers covered: non-compliance, penalties, jury nullification, 2nd
Amendment profiling into domestic terrorists, government tyranny, police, sheriff, and more.

Other topics, and especially on the people forming militias was missed due to full camera memory.

Welcome to blue collar Buffalo.

* * *

Clarence, NY (WKBW) -

A question and answer session on New York's new gun law turned testy, as gun owners unleash a fury of anger on the new legislation.

Frustration boiled over for people who feel as though they are law abiding citizens, being turned into criminals.

For many, it was a chance to vent anger at Albany.

One WNYer even said "You put a brown shirt on Mr. Cuomo and put him on
television, he would look just like Hitler."

Another chimed in, "Angry people get together, they form militias
folks. This country, this WNY is prime for something like that!"

Western New York gun owners say they SAFE Act and its ban on assault weapons makes no sense.

One of the big concerns -- who is footing the bill for making changes to guns that are now considered assault weapons. State officials told the crowd the gun owners are the ones responsible.

People in the crowd also had a lot of questions about the registration laws. One gun owner asked,"What is the penalty if you don't register it? 'Cause I guarantee there's a lot of people that aren't going to."

At times, advocates felt answers were incomplete or political."

Link to video (short version)


Link to video (full 33 minute version)


Connect to AAE
   Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AgainstAllEnemies (Click "Like")
   Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/@AAEnemies ("Follow")
   YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/AAEnemies ("Subscribe")
Disclaimer: These opinions are solely my own, and do not reflect the opinions or official positions of any United States Government agency, organization or department.

Monday, January 07, 2013

Serrano Puts Forth Resolution to End Presidential Term Limits

Rep. Jose Serrano (D-NY)
Representative Jose Serrano (D-NY) wants to repeal the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution that places term limits on the office of the President.  (Of note, Serrano is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which according to my research is an organization that supports Marxist policies.)

No, I repeat, NO President, whether Democrat, Republican, or otherwise, should serve more than two 4-year terms as President, whether continuous or separated by time.

In fact, members of Congress have clearly shown that they need term limits as well.

Why?  Because our "representative" government has become its own aristocracy concerned more with their own power, wealth and status rather than the needs and liberties of the people.  Term limits would only be the beginning.  We must elect representatives who actually understand, support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Congressman Puts Forward Resolution To End Term Limits On Presidency


Congressman Jose Serrano (D-NY) put forth a House resolution that would repeal the twenty-second article of amendment to the United States Constitution on Friday. This would effectively remove term limits on the Presidency should it be ratified by three-fourths of the States. It has currently been sent to the House Judiciary Committee. The resolution would also have to pass both houses of Congress by two-thirds in each house.
[...]
The following is the text of the resolution put forward:

H.J.RES.15 — Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual… (Introduced in House – IH)
113th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. J. RES. 15
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 2013

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:
`Article–
`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’.

Continue reading (article continues)...

Connect to AAE
   Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AgainstAllEnemies (Click "Like")
   Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/@AAEnemies ("Follow")
   YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/AAEnemies ("Subscribe")
Disclaimer: These opinions are solely my own, and do not reflect the opinions or official positions of any United States Government agency, organization or department.

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

Now Comes the Door-buster Crowd Control Bill

ON the heels of the Wal-Mart Black Friday trampling death of Jdimytai Damour, New York City Councilman James F. Gennaro thinks he’s come up with a solution. A "door-buster bill” would hold retailers accountable for injuries.

According to the Chicago Tribune, New York City Councilman James F. Gennaro is working on a "door-buster bill" that would require large retailers and malls to make appropriate security arrangements whenever a big sales event is likely to attract large numbers of shoppers.

"We need to provide, at a bare minimum, public safety and security to make sure when people come to these things they are walking into a safe and secure environment," Gennaro said.

On the other hand, the National Retail Federation vice president, Joseph LaRocca, believes that this isn’t the answer. He wants customers to take responsibility for their own actions. He said that retailers don’t condone people rushing doors and overpowering employees but, "It is something the individual customer has to be accountable for."

A University of Michigan marketing professor, Aradhna Krishna, recommends that the “doorbusting” practice be stopped altogether because it creates a “herd-mentality” insanity.

She said the formula for the insanity is a simple one: superlow prices, increased demand, limited supply and a clock that's running down.

Neil Stern, a senior partner in retail consulting firm McMillan Doolittle has suggested that retailers to issue tickets “for entrance as part of crowd control.”

Can individuals be held responsible for their actions or inaction as part of a frenzied group? Is there is such a thing as a herd-mentality group insanity plea?

Perhaps large retailers and malls will eventually act in their own interest by adopting measures that will eliminate door-busting? But is yet another law necessary?

For background on this story see, “What is Wal-Mart’s Responsibility in the Death of Jdimytai Damour?”

Originally published at Digital Journal by Barbara Sowell



Trackposted to Democrat=Socialist, and thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

What is Wal-Mart’s Responsibility in the Death of Jdimytai Damour?

Jdimytai Damour, a temporary worker, was trampled to death by crazed shoppers on Black Friday at the Wal-Mart in store on Long Island, N.Y. Should Wal-Mart have had better crowd control? Local police and a lawyer for the worker's family say “Yes!”

According to the Wall Street Journal, the personal-injury attorney hired by Mr. Damour’s sisters, Jordan Hecht, said that Wal-Mart did not have enough security guards and the staff was not property trained.

Although Wal-Mart is defending its policies, a lawsuit may be filed against Wal-Mart and “possibly other parties” after Mr. Hecht reviews the police reports.

The Wall Street Journal also reports that Wal-Mart’s liability may be limited.

Mr. Damour was hired through a temporary-employment agency; if he is deemed to be a Wal-Mart employee, the retailer's liability may be limited under New York state's worker-compensation laws, Mr. Hecht said.

Wal-Mart claims it took extra precautions in preparation for Black Friday by hiring third-party security guards, setting up barricades, and having extra staff on hand. However Lt. Kevin Smith, “head of the county’s public-information office,” admits that:

“We went above and beyond the call of duty," Lt. Smith said. "Our jobs are not to act as Wal-Mart's security guards. It did not appear that there were enough security guards visible."

The Wall Street Journal compared Wal-Mart’s insufficient preparation to that of Best Buy Co. which controls shoppers by roping off areas to place shoppers in single file lines. Additionally, Best Buy Co. has advanced employee drills and uses employees to defuse tension with the shoppers and to had out hot product tickets before the doors open.

The Oragonian Editorial Board called Damour’s death “A preventable death at Wal-Mart,” and placed the blame squarely on Wal-Mart’s shoulders.

The editorial states that the mob may have crushed Damour but “the retail giant that laid the man at the mob's feet.”

The Oragonian editorial claims that Wal-Mart “continues to cut corners in ways that hurt workers” and that Damour’s store had “the bare minimum of extra security on Black Friday.”

While commending Wal-Mart for going greener, for working closely with local communities, and for donating $275,000 to the Oregon Food Bank, the editorial slaps Wal-Mart for continuing to get it wrong with its workers.

This is hardly the first time Wal-Mart put workers last to save a few bucks. The company has faced numerous sanctions for worker-related violations, including prohibiting workers from taking breaks and compelling them to work off the clock.

An excellent opinion article by Paul Bright in Digital Journal offers an insight into the corporate mentality that brought about this horrible tragedy.

After the scene was over, Wal-Mart, obviously hurting for dollars, re-opened the store to continue pushing our capitalist society into the black. And we cry that our economy is slowing down? Who slowed down for Damour?

Originally published in Digital Journal by Barbara Sowell



Trackposted to Leaning Straight Up, third world county, The World According to Carl, and DragonLady's World, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Follow faultlineusa on Twitter