Sunday, July 08, 2007

Anticipating or Resisting North American Integration?

Note: Apologies in advance for the continued blogger block quote formatting problems.

On September 30, 2007 a final report from the CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) concerning the North American Future 2025 project will be published in English, Spanish and French, and is scheduled for submission to all three governments (the U.S., Canada and Mexico). . .

A formal proposal will be made to Congress this fall for the anticipated integration of our three nations…

The plans for the North American Union continue to move ahead and expand unimpeded by the need for any congressional approval or oversight through the secretive inner workings of North American Free Trade Agreement. Thanks a lot to Bill and George W!

H/T to Prison Planet for bringing us this disgusting news.

Paul Joseph Watson

Globalist political heavyweights are preparing to formally propose to
Congress the merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a North American Union
at the end of summer after they held secret meetings to devise a plan that will
be presented to representatives of all three governments.

"A powerful think tank chaired by former Sen. Sam Nunn and guided by
trustees including Richard Armitage, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Harold Brown, William
Cohen and Henry Kissinger, is in the final stages of preparing a report to the
White House and U.S. Congress on the benefits of integrating the U.S., Mexico
and Canada into one political, economic and security bloc," reports World Net Daily .

"The data collected for the report is based on seven secret roundtable
sessions involving between 21 and 45 people and conducted by CSIS. The
participants are politicians, business people, labor leaders and academics from
all three countries with equal representation."

Here’s a peak at the CSIS globalist rhetoric from the North American Future 2025 project. . .

The free flow of people across national borders will undoubtedly continue
throughout the world as well as in North America, as will the social, political
and economic challenges that accompany this trend," says the report. "In order
to remain competitive in the global economy, it is imperative for the
twenty-first century North American labor market to possess the flexibility
necessary to meet industrial labor demands on a transitional basis and in a way
that responds to market forces. . .

Much of the contemporary literature on globalization principally
focuses on the liberalization of trade and investment and, to a lesser
extent, on labor mobility and its direct or indirect implications on a
nation’s economy. Nevertheless, the phenomenon of international
migration of labor is embedded in the current trend of economic openness. . .

Didn’t that make you want to throw up???

Now let me get this straight . . . We are going to improve our security and prosperity by merging/integrating with a corrupt nation that impoverishes millions of its own citizens to the point that they feel that they must invade America??? Now that’s a plan!

The free flow of people across national borders is one of the overall goals of the NAU. What I find so interesting and sadly amusing is how vehemently many on the American left share our conservative opposition to this Globalist plot to integrate the U.S., Canada and Mexico and yet this same American left champions ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION? Ok, excuse me. Logical consistency isn’t the left’s strong point!

The unofficial John Edwards 08 Blog wants to repeal NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) but nobody at that blog even knows where Edwards stands on the issue.

This NAFTA superhighway
is a key piece of the coming "North American Union" that government
planners in the new trilateral region of United States, Canada and Mexico are
about to drive into reality.

Moving away from the far Edwards left, The Raving Wingnut offered Ron Paul’s views on the NAU.

Asked what the ultimate agenda was behind the American Union and the push
on behalf of the Bush administration to homogenize the US with Mexico and
Canada, Paul was clear in his response.

"I think the goal is one world government... we have the WTO, the IMF, the World Bank, then we have all the subsidiaries like NAFTA and hemispheric governments, highways coming

Total Enslavement looks at the NAU with an eye to The New World Order. Would a sinister globalist bring about another 9/11 crisis just to merge our three nations? Here he cross posts the original article by Jerome R. Corsi originally published December 15, 2006 in Here’s an excerpt.

Robert Pastor, a leading intellectual force in the move to create an
North American Community, told WND he believes a new 9/11 crisis
could be the
catalyst to merge the U.S., Mexico and Canada. . .

In May 2005, Pastor was co-chairman the Council on Foreign
Relations task force that produced a report entitled "Toward a North American
Community," which he has claimed is the blueprint behind the SSP declared by
President Bush, Mexico's then-President Vicente Fox, and Canada's then-Prime
Minister Paul Martin. . .

Pastor told WND he lamented that the
leadership of the three North American countries is not positioned to make the
type of tough decisions needed to advance a North American Community agenda. .

Pastor was asked if he thought a North American Union was a bad

"No," he replied. "I don't think a political union of North America is
an inherently bad idea, nor do I think it is a good idea for North America right
now. I teach a course at American University in which I look at the different
options for political integration of North America, and I put the options before
the students."

Then why is a North American Union a bad idea right now?

OK, now hold on to your hats. Here’s the key – the big snag to this deal. (Bold added by me.)

"The reason the political integration is not a good idea at this stage now,
perhaps never, is because of people like yourself who immediately begin to fear
that their sense of America could disappear," Pastor responded. "Somehow, if you're fearful that America's sovereignty will disappear,
you won't even take small steps forward.
You just get mired in the
status quo. The problem is that the world is moving very rapidly, and you can't
stay competitive if you don't move."

Pastor did not reject the idea that a North American Union
could form, but only after further continental economic integration and the development of a North American Community in which people are able to think as citizens of North America.

HELL NO! We will NEVER willingly be citizens of North America! We are proud citizens of the United States of America and if you try to force this NAU upon us it will be the beginning of the next American Revolution!

Others Blogging about the NAU
Dad2059s House Of Tin Foil
Giuliani Linked to “NAFTA Superhighway”


  1. Every time I post on this, I have some commenters who make fun, saying it's just a scar tactic, there's nothing to it. But anyone with a computer can research and see that there IS something to this. I'm with you, no way I want this to happen. I'm an American.

    We've got the EU and can see what a utter failure that is. Look back at the USSR and what a failure that was. Does anyone with a brain really want this. I think it is mostly business/corporations behind it.

    It'd a very bad idea.

    I voted.

  2. Debbies right..the absudity knows no bounds!!!!!!!!!!

  3. Yes it's a bad idea that will destroy this country. If you haven't yet read it, please go read "What We Face" by Jim Simpson.

    Here's the link to paste: