Showing posts with label Military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Military. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
The U.S. armed forces have been weakened by budget cuts and ideology
Commentary by James Shott
In recent years America’s military has experienced operational readiness issues. A good bit of this is due to budget cuts resulting from the 2013 sequestration, but some sources also blame philosophical ideas about the military within the Obama administration.
Sequestration, as explained by CNN at the time, is “a series of automatic, across-the-board cuts to government agencies, totaling $1.2 trillion over 10 years. The cuts would be split 50-50 between defense and domestic discretionary spending. More than $500 billion will be cut from the Defense Department and other national security agencies, with the rest cut on the domestic side…”
The Pentagon, under then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, planned to reach its mandated cuts through furloughs of hundreds of thousands of civilian workers in combat readiness training and weapons maintenance. He said at the time that the $46 billion in cuts the first year would significantly affect military readiness, and the longer the sequestration lasts, the deeper cuts that will be required to achieve the mandated savings.
Just how badly this has affected military readiness is demonstrated in a Fox News story earlier this month. The U.S. Air Force, the smallest of the four major armed services, has cut staff to the degree that many military personnel now work extra shifts performing administrative jobs previously performed by civilians.
These cuts have put the Air Force in the position of being short 4,000 service personnel to maintain its aircraft and 700 pilots to fly them. Personnel are now cannibalizing parts from planes no longer in service and stored at a desert site called "The Boneyard" and from planes on display in museums to repair active aircraft.
Master Sgt. Bruce Pfrommer, who has worked on B-1 bombers for more than 20 years, told Fox that at Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota, where the 28th Bomber Wing is located, only nine of the 20 bombers there can fly. Those aircraft are closing in on 10,000 flight hours each, compared to about 1,000 when Pfrommer started working on them 20 years ago.
"Our retention rates are pretty low. Airmen are tired and burnt out,” Staff Sgt. Tyler Miller, of the 28th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron at Ellsworth, told Fox. "When I first came in seven years ago, we had six people per aircraft — and the lowest man had six or seven years of experience," Miller said. "Today, you have three-man teams and each averages only three years of experience."
The Navy also has operational issues. A Government Accountability Office report issued earlier this month, titled “Navy’s Optimized Fleet Response Plan” (OFRP) discusses problems facing our sea-going service. While the report does not specifically mention sequestration budget cuts, the symptoms support this as a least part of the problem.
An excerpt from the OFRP tells us that:
• Over the past decade, high operational tempo has reduced the predictability of ship deployments for sailors and for the industrial base that supports ship repair and maintenance. For example, carrier strike group deployment lengths have increased from an average of 6.4 months between 2008 – 2011 and 8.2 months between 2012 – 2014, to 9 months for three carrier strike groups in 2015.
• Increased deployment lengths have resulted in declining ship conditions and materiel readiness, and in a maintenance backlog that has not been fully identified or resourced, according to Navy officials.
• The declining condition of ships has increased the duration of time that ships spend undergoing maintenance in the shipyards, which in turn compresses the time available in the schedule for training and operations.
In its 2016 assessment of the four major military branches, the Heritage Foundation shows how true Panetta’s prediction was. The assessment rated the Army as “weak,” and the Navy, Marines and Air Force as “marginal,” rating the U.S. military overall as “marginal.”
In addition to budget cuts, reports of military brass being displeased with President Obama’s policies also pose questions.
Writing in Politico in 2013 Rosa Brooks noted, “In my interviews, however, many senior military leaders complained of feeling baffled and shut out by a White House National Security Staff.”
“The NSS wants to run the show, day to day and minute to minute,” laments a former military official, “so they have no time—they’re almost incapable of strategic thinking.” Another recently retired senior general said, “I don’t understand the process by which the White House is making strategic or foreign-policy decisions. … There’s an appearance of consultation, but you know you won’t be listened to.”
The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution provides that the federal government “provide for the common defense.” But in Article Four, Section Four, it states specifically that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” No other power of the federal government shares that strong a requirement for performance.
No reasonable observer would contend that the federal government is obeying its Constitutional mandate to “provide for the common defense.”
How does the Commander in Chief plan to fix this?
Cross-posted from Observations
Friday, September 26, 2014
Ebola versus ISIS: Which is more threatening
Ebola
versus ISIS: which is more threatening
America,
in the recent past, has been defined by a series of crises and scandals so
profound our very existence has been placed at risk. ISIS, a barbaric Muslim
group, seeks to decapitate all nonbelievers and an Ebola plague have been added
to the mix. Waiting in the shadows until American forces retreated from Iraqi
soil ISIS arrived on the scene more virulent than its predecessor. In the space
of a few months their ranks have swollen with volunteers from across the planet
including America. With their recent surge in Syria and Iraq an unexplainable
brutality has followed in their wake. More calculating and better prepared than
Al-Qaeda their front is moving quickly to engulf as much as the Middle East as
their assets allow. Obama has stammered and stonewalled in meeting this threat
head on. His
coalition
of nations to defeat ISIS is in name only. America, so far, has led the bombing
assault on isolated sites with coalition members adding salt and pepper raids not
helping with the more meaty targets. Our national media has hyped up the threat
this newest terrorist group projects. Massively small in numbers, ISIS is more
bark than bite. Successful media campaigns to keep Muslim hysteria alive has
worked for thirteen years but ISIS, as a threat, does not come near the
intensity of that posed by Ebola.
Ebola
is coming our way. This twenty first century plague will not be contained by
speeches or minor gestures from World governments. Hot zones where the virus is
flourishing need to be quickly quarantined. Obama’s decision to send 3,000
American troops into the area is nothing less than suicide for many of these
brave folks. Once the body captures the virus there is a 50 to 90% fatality
rate. No cure presently exists. Hospitals in affected areas have few doctors
and personnel. Most have left knowing their lives were at risk. Ebola has
mutated many times. Suggestive evidence exists a respiratory component to its
transmission is not far behind. Ebola will reach our shores because of the
blind-sided actions of our central government. Tens of thousands of visas have
been issued to Africans to visit the United States. Many are student visas.
Others are for business or vacations. Strong possibilities exist that a few
will bring this vermin with them. Unbeknownst to the American Public more
infected souls have been brought into the country for treatment than we have
been told. With porous borders the potential spread may be amplified by
multiples. Ebola is similar to ISIS, the virus has no heart or soul. Yet its
virulence is exponentially worse than the scourge ISIS brings to the
battlefield. Bad policies, bad politics and insurmountable incompetence will
bring ISIS home to roost. Best case scenario a few minds will come to grips with
reality concerning this disease and provide a proportional response. As of this
writing ISIS is finally receiving the attention it deserves, Ebola is not.
Mark
Davis MD, President of Davis Writing Services. Author of Obamacare Dead on
Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster and Demons of Democracy.
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
The Washington Navy Yard shooting highlights many serious problems
Before the gun smoke had dispersed at the Washington Navy
Yard, the agenda media reacted with a kind of grim glee that an “assault
weapon” – an AR-15 – had been used yet again in a mass shooting.
The New York Daily News devoted its entire front page to the
story with the headline, “Same Gun Different Slay,” in letters so big they took
up two-thirds of the page. Inside the publication was an anti-gun column by
Mike Lupica titled, “AR-15 is the rifle for the ‘sport’ of hunting humans.”
MSNBC even used an animation of the shooting, featuring an
AR-15, while CNN's Piers Morgan said, "He was carrying an AR-15 assault
rifle, another rifle, and a handgun.”
The Washington Post asked how the suspected shooter,
Aaron Alexis, acquired “his weapons (an AR-15 assault rifle, a shotgun and a
semiautomatic pistol were reportedly found on him).”
Some of this results from the drive to get news out first.
But hardly all of it.
And then, of course, the politicians got into the act.
“A gunman appeared with an assault rifle, and several other
weapons,” said Illinois Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin on the Senate floor.
California Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein released a
statement which read, “This is one more event to add to the litany of massacres
that occur when a deranged person or grievance killer is able to obtain
multiple weapons — including a military-style assault rifle — and kill many
people in a short amount of time.”
Even the hallowed halls of academia were not immune to the
ranting of the unhinged. (surprise, surprise, surprise!!)
“#NavyYardShooting The blood is on the hands of the #NRA,”
tweeted David Guth, an associate professor of Journalism at the University of
Kansas William Allen White School of Journalism. “Next time, let it be YOUR
sons and daughters,” he continued. “Shame on you. May God damn you.”
To its credit, the University suspended Guth. With such as
this in journalism classrooms, it’s no wonder there is bias in the news media.
“The contents of Guth’s tweet were repugnant and in no way
represent the views or opinions of the University of Kansas,”
an official statement said. Whether UK works like the federal government,
and keeps suspended misbehavers on the payroll, it didn’t say.
Well, Sen. Feinstein, Sen. Durbin, Prof. Guth, et al, we
certainly have had enough of these incidents. But we’ve also had enough of you
folks and your mis-informing cronies in the media allowing your emotions and
your prejudices to commandeer your thought process and produce automatic
responses that are so grossly wrong.
The shooter had only his own recently and legally acquired
shotgun when he started the rampage, and is thought to have taken a handgun
from one of his security officer victims along the way. No “assault rifle” was
involved.
Moving from the thoughtless responses of these demagogues to
the somber realities and serious issues that exist, we need to recognize that
the most serious of these is clearly not a need for more gun control.
Washington,
DC has some of the strictest gun
laws in the country and the Navy Yard prohibits weapons being carried by anyone
except for military police and other law enforcement and security personnel;
not even trained military personnel who may carry weapons when they are
deployed can carry a weapon on the Yard.
Alexis, who worked for a civilian contractor at the Navy
Yard, had a history of arrests for weapons violations and mental health issues.
Except for him, the military and civilian personnel assigned to and working at
the Navy Yard obeyed the rules and didn’t bring guns to the Yard. Stronger gun
laws would have made no difference at all.
Like gun-free schools without armed security, gun-free
military bases have become shooting galleries for people who do not obey gun
control laws and want to do bad things.
All kinds of screw-ups took place here, among which are:
**Lousy security checks – Given his criminal and mental health
past, how was Alexis able to legally obtain the shotgun and a security
clearance?
**Dumb rules about weapons on military facilities – On both Ft. Hood
and the Navy Yard, had military personnel carried weapons, the shooters might
never have planned those attacks, but they almost certainly would have done far
less damage.
**The base security staff was undermanned when the shooting
started, and had to close the gates to the base so they could respond to the
emergency, and that interfered with civilian police trying to get on the base
to help.
**Media knee-jerk misinformation appears to have emanated from
an anti-gun mentality that leads to a shoot first, get details later process.
At least the media didn’t try to associate Alexis with TEA
Party organizations or the Republican Party, as has often occurred in the past;
they would have been wrong about that, too. A friend of Aaron Alexis, Michael
Ritrovato, told CNN’s Jake Tapper that he was “more of a liberal type, not
conservative like I am.”
Let’s hold our breath to see how the media
distort the coming debate over raising the debt ceiling yet again and a
possible government shutdown.
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Is The Cost of Freedom Too High? Totalitarian Socialism is Much Cheaper!
Is The Cost of Freedom Too High? Totalitarian Socialism is Much Cheaper!A Commentary by J. D. Longstreet
************************************************

I’ve thought about it for a long while now and I have concluded that the US needs to recant its pledge not to be the first to use the atom bomb in a war/conflict. I mean, hey, we did it, already. Two of them, in fact! Perhaps you remember August 1945 and a place called Japan??? I do!
Look, we are allowing ourselves to be tied up in these little brushfire wars in Afghanistan, and Iraq, when both could be ended by a flight of B-2’s and a few nukes.
What about the problem in Iran? Well, Mr. Ahmadinejad wants the atomic bomb? Well, I say give it to him, several, actually, delivered from the bomb bay of a B-2, or B-52 bomber.
Then… the little squirt in North Korea, we could provide a demonstration of what a REAL atomic blast looks like… up close and personal!
For those of you screaming at the computer and pulling your hair out about now, YES, I know it is extreme. But understand this: the whiners and those who bitch, and moan, about the war in Afghanistan going badly, and those who force our armed forces to fight with one, or both, hands tied behind their backs are, quite frequently, the same people. They are quickly pushing the US into a corner. A corner, from which, the only means of escape is to lash out in all directions. The most effective way to do that is with our atomic arsenal.
I hear the “national scolds” complaining that we have now been in Iraq as longer than it took for us to fight the Second World War. Well, actually, that’s true, but we have less KIA’s than we had the day we hit the beach in Normandy!
So, you want to leave win the war, any war? Use the nuke arsenal. It would be quick, efficient, very effective, and there would be no question as to the victor. Leave the offending country a radioactive pile of debris for the next few thousand years.
We have the material, the methods, and the means to take out any country causing trouble for us in the world. I must tell you, those atomic weapons, as costly as they are, would be more cost efficient than placing a couple hundred thousand troops on the ground, in a troublesome region, and supporting those troops while forcing them to fight handicapped. And that is what we are doing, currently!
Hey, I’m tired of all the bellyaching, all the bitching, and moaning, coming from the very people who could not screw up enough courage to defend their own shadow. I’m tired of good, loyal, American men and women spilling their blood and laying down their lives for a whole segment of our society who have no respect, nor love for the country nor their fellow Americans. I’m tired of the useful, idiots our enemies find, in abundance, in the governing bodies in Washington.
What you will, my fellow Americans, but we have become two nations, again, much as this country split in the 1860’s. I’m not talking about a North/South split… I’m talking about a “Love America/Hate America” split. The last presidential election did nothing to bring us closer together. In fact, it appears Obama’s election has driven us even farther apart. We are hopelessly split apart and the Union, though it appears as one on paper, in reality… it no longer exists. Neither side has any interest, at all, in rejoining the other.
The “Hate America” and the “Blame America First” crowds (one and the same) have sapped this country of its will to survive. Any medical practitioner will tell you that when the will to survive is gone… all is lost.
The story is told of a Confederate general, during the darkest days of the America “War Between the States,” sending a dispatch to the Commanding General, Gen Robert E. Lee. In the dispatch, the Southern general is said to report that he and his troops were cut off, vastly outnumbered, the causality rate was extremely high, they were without provisions, and their ammunition was all but gone. In summation that Southern cavalier told Gen. Lee he would do the only thing left for him, and his men, to do. So, he said, they would attack, at dawn, with everything they had at their disposal!
That is the America I was born into. That is the America I grew up in. That is the America for which I wore the uniform of the US Army, and that is the America, which does not exist anymore.
I am frustrated with “mealy-mouthed” Americans who will accept second place. In my America, second place didn’t exist… in anything. Like the US Marine Corp, the improbable we did right away. The impossible took us just a tad longer.
I have been chided for stating that the US losses in Iraq are well within the acceptable range. Look, you don’t go to war if deaths are not acceptable. Rather, you bow your head and bare your neck to the chains of slavery. If you would remain free you must be willing to pay the price. The price for freedom is high. It is paid in the blood of patriots… the men and women of our Armed Forces.
I am heartsick at what this nation has become. America is now a cesspool of deviancy, mediocrity, cowardice, socialism, secularism, hedonism, and, regardless of what Obama says we are without hope.
Somewhere, about the late 1960’s to early 1970’s, Americans, like the shirker, in the Bible, decided to bury our talents for safekeeping rather than risk them in order to have them grow and benefit the country. Now we are paying the price for that reticence to risk everything for each other.
We are growing apart as a people. Our national conversation has grown shrill and vulgar. We can’t communicate with each other. When we try, it turns into a shouting match. We have become course, crass, and without sophistication. Our gentility is gone.
Finally, we have painted ourselves into a corner now. A corner, which threatens to deny us, even our own survival. Only drastic action will save us… and, unfortunately, many Americans do not wish to be saved and those who do are not interested in saving those who don’t. We are feeding upon ourselves.
I began this piece by pointing out where this attitude of mediocrity has gotten America in its war-fighting capability and the cost to recover that capability. Atomic Bombs will certainly win for us on the battlefields, but they will do nothing to salvage our land.
American men and women in uniform are growing tired of sacrificing their blood, limbs, and lives, for fellow Americans who actually want them to lose! And why would they not? They have grown distrustful of their Commander-in-Chief who is plainly dragging hi feet while trying to make a decision on whether oer not to allow those American fighting ment to have the resources they say they need to win the war in Afghanistan. Once before, in Somalia, a President (of the same political party) denied a request from the commanders on the ground and it cost the lives of at least 18 US service men and resulted in the withdrawal of US troops from that troubled land – and -- emboldened America’s enemies to such a degree that they flew plane loads of people into skyscrapers in our greatest city killing thousands of innocent Americans. The trust of many of our service men and women for their fellow Americans has been forever shattered. When the time comes for them to send their young sons and daughters to war for the US … will they do it? Can you blame them?
When a nations vision is forced to dissipate, that nation is doomed. When a nation’s hopes, and dreams, and aspirations, are shelved because social programs, such as socialized medicine, take precedence over that national vision… the death knell has sounded. When a nation sends it’s national treasure, its sons, and daughters, into harm’s way… and abandons them, that nation has lost its soul. Make no mistake about it. Many US troops in Afghanistan are beginning to question if their Commander-in-Chief has abandoned them.
Here are the words of the 35th President of the United States, John F. Kennedy, a man even his own party would seek to impeach today:
“The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it. And one path we shall never choose, and that is the path of surrender, or submission.”… Pres. John F. Kennedy
Kennedy also said:
“There are risks and costs to a program of action, but they are far less than the long-range risks and costs of comfortable inaction”
President Harry Truman, the 33rd President of the US, said the following:
“America was not built on fear. America was built on courage, on imagination, and unbeatable determination to do the job at hand.”
Nowadays, the men mentioned above would be accused of insisting on “staying the course”. They would be ridiculed and hounded from office… even by their own Democrat Party.
That, Dear Reader, is how far we have sunk!
J. D. Longstreet
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
