Showing posts with label Assad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Assad. Show all posts

Friday, September 06, 2013

Syria: wrong war, wrong time, wrong president


Syria: wrong war, wrong time, wrong president

 

America is on the eve of another mistake. Arm twisting, not to dissimilar to the efforts made for Obamacare, have resurfaced to force passage of Congressional authorization to attack Syria. Will President Obama grease the fingers of members of Congress to obtain their vote, as he has done under other circumstances, will be revealed as the process moves forward. Secretary of State John Kerry has been roaming the media for support to rage yet another war in the Middle East. He has been challenged and in some cases impugned for his stance on the Syrian dilemma. John Kerry, no stranger to controversy, has provided quasi answers to direct questions concerning chemical weapons used on Syrian civilians. His success in moving Obama’s agenda forward appears to be failing. Recent reports on Drudge and Fox news indicate there are not enough members of either house willing to stick their necks into another noose for Obama, as they did with the tragedy called Obamacare. President Obama has reluctantly sought Congressional approval for his pending folly. Many commentators suspect Obama wants shared responsibility with the legislative branch in case events do not pan out in America’s favor. Most recent statistics note over 100,000 dead since the Syrian civil conflict began. People displaced from their homes numbers one to two million. Aside from the carnage, cities have been devastated by sustained bombings and brutal combat. Syria and its President harbor no fondness for America. Without this civil conflict raging, Syrians would once again turn their attentions to destroying Israel and American interests. The logical question to ask: Why is Obama pushing for intervention at this late date? He claims someone must hold Syria responsible for using chemical agents on a civilian population. Reports indicate chemical weapons may have been used several times in the past 30 months, without a whimper from the White House. There may be more reasons that have not been revealed by the Obama Administration for this poorly defined mission. Obama’s ineffectual style of management, for this war effort to nowhere, can be viewed on many levels. He has literally told Assad what his plans are for a potential attack.  There are no clear cut goals established by the President and no exit strategy. Obama requested permission for a brief assault, yet his Congressional minions are requesting a minimum of ninety days. No boots on the ground is another fallacy thrown into the mix. America is about to make a bigger mistake than electing the present occupant of the White House. This one will cost the lives of too many innocents to be worth the incursion. Congress should vote down any request for a Syrian attack. If Obama then goes it alone, the ramifications could be enough to draw impeachment charges against him. Let us all hope saner minds prevail. Mark Davis, MD President of Healthnets Review Services and Davis Book Reviews. Author of Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming book, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. www.healthnetsreviewservices.com platomd@gmail.com    twitter.com/americassage Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition. Join us and comment on this and other political events taking place.

Monday, June 17, 2013

Syria: America's next mistake


Syria: America’s next mistake

 

Syria is immersed in a civil war whose incipience dates from March of 2011. Popular demonstrations during that time were concurrent with the Arab Spring in other countries, which called for transitions in their various governments. In Syria, protesters vehemently demanded Syrian President Bashar al-Assad immediately step-down from his long-term post. Equally as significant, they wanted an end to Ba’ath Party rule. Assad responded to these civil protests with violent acts including but not limited to mass shootings, torture, and outright murders of political dissidents. Assad came to power on the heels of his father, Hafez al-Assad, who died in 2000. Desperate to hold onto the reins of power, Bashar has shown he will go to the extreme. Recent revelations his army used chemical weapons on civilians displays he will do anything to quell the opposition. Estimates of 100, 000 casualties to date, from this civil war, creates a growing pressure on the surrounding countries to find a solution to this “uncivil conflict.” Countries and rogue political groups are involving themselves in the mix. Hezbollah has sided with the Syrian regime while Al-Qaeda has moved in the direction of the rebels. Russia has sent munitions to Assad and recent news reveals Iran is sending 4,000 troops to aid the current regime. As the days go by, more needless deaths are paraded across World Media outlets. Within the last week, the Executive Branch has decided to aid the rebels with a level of armaments yet to be determined. Obama Administration officials know that once the two sides find common ground and settle their differences the newly unified country will return to its hate America posture. Why provide Syria with weapons knowing that enemies of this country will take possession of them?  Obama’s penchant to place Muslim interests before those of Americans is very well known. Similar to the minor pretext used by the Johnson Administration to involve the nation in Vietnam, Obama is taking a page from history and repeating an error. In this case, Obama’s pretext is utilization by the Syrian regime of chemical weapons on a small number of its citizens. America is risking involvement in a conflict which can quickly explode into a regional war. Polls, taken by both major political persuasions, show overwhelmingly lack of enthusiasm to enter this civil war. While ancient John McCain pushes for our hand in the mix, Sarah Palin has shouted from her media pulpit the reverse. From a historical perspective, America will inch its way forward towards full involvement, including boots on the ground. In nearly every decision President Obama has made on foreign policy, the consequences have been nothing less than fatal to a country that has seen enough war. America should stay out Syria, nothing good will come from our involvement. Mark Davis MD, President of Healthnets Review Services, platomd@gmail.com, www.healthnetsreviewservices.com, Author of the book Demons of Democracy and the forthcoming work, Obamacare: Dead on Arrival, A Prescription for Disaster. Manager of the group on LinkedIn, Government in Transition. Join, comment and debate with some of the best minds on LinkedIn. Look for us on twitter.com/americassage.

Saturday, April 07, 2007

Blogs Against Nancy Pelosi Blogroll




Update: Nancy Pelosi


Perri Nelson's Website has just added a Blogs Against Nancy Pelosi Blogroll. Go to his site, follow the directions, and add this blogroll to your sidebar.
>
For more details on Nancy's blunder read Nancy Pelosi Jihadist Darling
>
Pelosi trackbacks:
Lebanese Slam Pelosi's Syria TripExcerpt: Pelosi's statements and visual cues by visiting Syria have damaged human rights in the region, especially in Lebanon, which has been trying to get out from under Syria's yoke of oppression for years. Syria continues to provide assistance to Hizbullah...Weblog: A Blog For All
>
Democrats—The Isolationist PartyExcerpt: But, it's not just the Brits. The Democrats led by Pelosi, Murtha and Reid are heading down the same path:Weblog: Potbelly Stove
>
>

Nancy Pelosi Jihadist Darling


Will the MSM keep up the pressure on Nancy for her visit to Syria to negotiate foreign policy, which was against the wishes of the Executive Branch and in violation of the constitution? Will the Dhimmicratic controlled House of Representatives censure her for being in violation of the Logan Act? It’s highly doubtful unless we bloggers keep the pressure on. So what are we waiting for? Let’s give Pelosi and her merry band criminals a sustained blogburst!!!
>
>
Read the Arab News - the Middle East’s Leading English Language Daily
>
. . .What Pelosi Stands For . . .The Pelosization of US foreign policy could plunge the Middle East into endless civil and regional wars, facilitate the return of terrorist organizations now facing defeat and ultimate destruction, and, in time, threaten US national security on a grander scale. And that, in turn, could force the US into wars bigger and costlier than the ones in Afghanistan and Iraq that Pelosi regards as mistakes.
>
Read the Wall Street Journal editorial Illegal Diplomacy by ROBERT F. TURNER
>
. . . Ms. Pelosi and her Congressional entourage spoke to President Assad on various issues, among other things saying, "We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace." She is certainly not the first member of Congress--of either party--to engage in this sort of behavior, but her position as a national leader, the wartime circumstances, the opposition to the trip from the White House, and the character of the regime she has chosen to approach make her behavior particularly inappropriate.
>
Read the New York Post editorial Hating America, Loving Nancy by Amir Taheri
. . .The Pelosi mission confirms the analysis made by Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that the United States is incapable of developing and implementing a long-term strategy. In this analysis, America might wake up one morning and decide to do the exact opposite of what it has been doing for years.
>
The region's most radical elements liked Pelosi best if only because she endorsed their campaign of vilification against the Bush administration. In effect, her motto was: Surrender before you have to, and claim credit for it. She represented a superpower that, because no one can take away anything from it, is prepared to give away everything.
>
The Pelosi Doctrine, as demonstrated during the tour, is the opposite of the Bush Doctrine spelled out in 2002.
>
Read the USA Today editorial. Even those in disagreement with the President’s policy can see that Pelosi has harmed this nation (not to mention Israel) by her visit.
>
Some of the many USA comments are jewels:
>
“Oh yes, and what a powerful statement to the world.............the United States Speaker of the House, 2nd in line for the presidency, donning required Muslim headgear for her trip to Syria. Good thing it was casual berka Wednesday.” (Highlights mine)
>
Of course, Jimmy the Dhimmi Carter praised the trip stating, “It’s long overdue, as a matter of fact.” He added, “When there is a crisis, the best way to help resolve the crisis is to deal with the people who are instrumental in the problem.”
>
Read The Boston Herald Road to Damascus not for amateurs
>
. . .A trip like Pelosi’s effectively rewards an outlaw Syria for nothing. What the “negotiate no matter what” crowd forgets is all the previous failed attempts to get Syria to negotiate seriously. They make new attempts and comments like Pelosi’s “the road to Damascus is a road to peace” nothing but rank foolishness. From 1993 to 2005, there have been many more than 20 high-level visits to Syria for nothing.
>
Even the lefty NYT had to admit . . .
>
. . .Ms. Pelosi did not help matters by claiming in Damascus that Israel was ready to talk — an assertion that Israeli officials were quick to deny. Her job is to spur the Bush administration to pursue active diplomacy, not to attempt to conduct that diplomacy herself. The more she hews to the careful path, the more useful her efforts will be.
>
Here’s a big hat tip to all of the bloggers who are writing about this vital story.
>
Angel of Woman Honor Thyself wrote Dhimmicrats: The EnemY Within
Thank you so bloody much Dhimmi Nancy Pelosi for lending credibility to the virulently anti-Semitic and anti America Bas-har Ass–ad. . .
>
Spree of Wake up America has an excellent article Are Members of Congress Above the Law? which brings up the issue of our new alternative Dhimmicratic government. >
According to Rep. Tom Lantos:
"We have an alternative Democratic foreign policy. I view my job as beginning with restoring overseas credibility and respect for the United States."
>
For background on the law and just how Pelosi has flaunted the constitution, read Peri Nelson’s Nancy Pelosi is a Felon
>
Michael P.F. van der Galiën writes that Lebanon isn’t happy with Pelosi’s trip.
>
How about the exclusive interview with Pelosi by Bob McCarthy :-)
“We were blindfolded, bound and stripped,” said Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi Friday in an exclusive interview with Bob McCarty Writes™.
>
Other Bloggers writing about Pelosi . . .
>
>
Follow faultlineusa on Twitter