Showing posts with label Thomas Sowell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thomas Sowell. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Newt Gingrich and the Left - UPDATE

Originally posted at Maggie's Notebook

UPDATE: Just now looking around Townhall.com, and I find that one of my favorite conservatives, Thomas Sowell, is also questioning the lack of effective communication from our Nation's leaders; in his words:
" Only where it counts -- in Washington -- are conservatives tongue-tied."
Read Mr. Sowell's related piece dated April 10, 2007 (after getting the general idea from my little hissy-fit below).

Originally posted April 8, 2007 5:40 PM

For several years Newt Gingrich has been my choice for President in 2008, but I changed my mind several months ago. While Gingrich is an exceptional thinker, creative and civil in thought and speech, and most certainly wants the best for America, he is deeply entrenched in Congressional friendships.

Thursday, Newt was interviewed by Paul W. Smith, sitting in for Rush Limbaugh. The news is next Tuesday’s debate on climate and environmental issues between Newt and John Kerry. When I first learned of this debate my reaction was, this is a very good thing. Newt has long been immersed in environmental issues and no one puts conflicting thought into succinct words better than Gingrich.

So, I'm listening to Gingrich and Smith, and liking the prospect of this debate, until...Newt emphasizes that the debate will not be a verbal “Wrestlemania,” points out his “long relationship” with Kerry, and then really rubs it in with “he’s a smart guy.” I am nauseous from hearing conservatives tout their civil accord with Democrats.

Smith pushes on and cuts to the chase, asking what all of conservative America wants to know:
"Honestly, you can take Kerry can't you?"
Newt's immediate, and defensive, response is,
"It's not a question of taking him."
You see, Newt wants to have "interesting dialog;" he wants to discuss "market oriented science," and that's all well and good – it’s a discussion this country needs to have, but the Left intends to bring America to its knees on this issue, fueled by the elite's quest for even more wealth, by manipulating the everyday habits of industrious Americans. They have no interest in entrepreneurial-endeavors that expose the folly of carbon offsets and such.

Newt, we watch you on talk shows, read your books - listen to your every word. You tamp-down Democrat strategists with the ease of picking lint. You are tough and calmly aggressive until...until...you pair up with an elected politician. Those leading, shaping and interpreting public policy should not shine a light on personal friendships. When you do, we angst over it, for recent history has not been kind to trusting Republicans who, daily, watch the unthinkable parade in front of us.

We are not asking you to abandon the fine art of gentlemanship, but we are asking you to be fearless in revealing the absurd; for instance, a worthy debate might be Sandy Berger's appalling behavior, or William Jefferson's $100,000.00 bribe. Ask the sitting-Senator Kerry to make a public statement on these issues, and when the statement is veiled and lukewarm, keep after it until you get the answers we all deserve. Do us a favor and put the elected on the hot seat, and encourage other conservative leaders to do the same. America will enthusiastically support you. Let Kerry find other avenues to promote his book, as you introduce your new, A Contract with the Earth, in a more respected forum where you need not let down your guard to friendship.

We want our finest conservatives to take-on "taking" the Left. We want our conservative leaders to call them out, one-by-one, these rude, mean-spirited, and dishonest politicians. If you personally like the Left, fine - just don't tell us about your buddyship until today’s dire issues have the opportunity to be settled by conservative measures.

Then you can tell us how fine Senator John Kerry and his cohorts may be. On a personal level, I concede that you think John Kerry is a swell guy, but when you “speak” such validation – out-loud, it hurts the conservative movement because the fence-sitter moderates look for the easy way out, and the Democrat strategists quote you, just as they did when you personally validated Hillary Clinton a few years ago. It only makes sense that we need every honest advantage, and praising the Left, when it’s not necessary, is to put your debate at risk. The problem is, conservative debate is just too proper and vulnerable when up against political friendships.

My message to all conservatives in the public arena today: Taking pride in the conservative nature of accord just gets us into trouble. It doesn't work anymore. Don't even think of telling us that you cannot bring yourself "down" to their level - that you will not stoop that low. Find a way to deal with these people. You're either the person for the job or you’re not. We want you to "take" Kerry, Pelosi, Reid, Durbin, Kennedy, Murtha, as well as Specter and Hagel and the other Republican liberals. They will eat us alive if you, and other Republican leaders, do not.

Ending Note: As I finish the above, Newt is on Fox News Sunday suggesting that it's best that Gonzales step-down, and Chuck Schumer is thrilled with Newt's conclusion. Tomorrow, I'm sure, Schumer will be in front of a mic and a camera, somewhere, with: Even Newt Gingrich agrees that Gonzales needs to resign.

Now, Newt is commenting that "his good friends on the Senate-side" will tie-up the Gonzalez investigation for months. I do not advocate Newt or any politician misrepresenting their own criticisms of any branch of government, but I do advocate turning the conversation to an advantage for the conservative side - always.

Tracked back by: The EcoLibertarian with Newt Gingrich digs a new trench. Excerpt: Newt Gingrich is the Republican former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives best-known for battling President Bill Clinton on just about everything and overseeing the process that led to Clinton’s impeachment. He and a wave of Republican ...

Technorati Tags:

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Thomas Sowell on Public Golf and Poverty

Cross-posted by Maggie's Notebook

Thomas Sowell gets pithy on "Priceless Politics". Writing about the plight of San Francisco's municipal golf courses, Sowell asks the rhetorical questions we all ask about our city governments, and provides the obvious common-sense answers; obvious, that is, to all but politicians and bureaucrats.

Here's a quote from Sowell's Townhall.com piece to pique your interest:
Are the taxpayers being asked to support municipal golf courses so that the poor and the downtrodden can play? Not bloody likely.
As San Francisco's six municipal golf courses lose money, Sowell suggests:
If the golf courses are losing money, then get rid of them. Given San Francisco's sky high land prices, selling the land that the golf courses are on would bring in millions, if not billions, of dollars.
Sowell reports that "recent renovations" cost the city more than $23 million, and
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, "the city closed the gap with $16.6 million from state bond funds meant for recreation and park projects in underserved and economically disadvantaged areas." In other words, the poor have once again been used as human shields, this time to protect golfers.
The homeless cannot sleep on golf courses. Children cannot play in sand boxes, swing on swings, or teeter on totters on golf courses. Those earning below middle incomes do not play golf often. While you can picnic in a park seven days a week, weather permitting, most of modest means rarely play golf. Sowell:
Put bluntly, the poor are in effect being used as human shields in the political wars over government spending, which extends far beyond anyone who could even plausibly be called poor.

Politicians will spend money wherever that is likely to increase their chances of getting re-elected. Of all the things that governments spend money on, none is further removed from fighting poverty than municipal golf courses.
We see politicians at the City, State and Federal level sell their votes, every day, to a "few" at the expense of many, as their Prada wallets and Louis Vuitton handbags grow fatter. They have no shame. Read Sowell's entire piece at Townhall.com.

Then this snippet from yesterday's Christian Science Monitor:
A 2005 study by the University of California at San Diego, for the city of San Diego, found that the average street person in California costs communities between $40,000 and $150,000 a year in public services ranging from health care to police.
So, for those of us who appreciate lower greens fees, (and I, personally, have no disaffection for Louis Vuitton bags) but also want to do our part to care for the legitimately disabled, protect the mentally ill, and feed the children...what are we to do? $40,000-$150,000 PER YEAR, per the "average street person in California" - and this in temperate climates! Give us a break! Sigh.

Permalink for this entry:
http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/2007/02/thomas-sowell-on-public-golf-and.html

Trackback URL for this entry:
http://haloscan.com/tb/maggiesnotebook/792944537725622155


Technorati Tags:
Follow faultlineusa on Twitter