Showing posts with label California. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California. Show all posts

Saturday, February 09, 2013

How Common Core Standards Are Destroying Our Children's Education

By Findalis
Monkey in the Middle




Last month California switch from their previous standards of education to Common Core Standards.  While hailed as a major step forward its true goal is to indoctrinate students to the "Progressive" agenda.  In fact it harms Black and Latino students by failing to prepare them for college.
California will no longer require eighth-graders to take algebra - a move that is line with the Common Core standards being adopted by most states, but that may leave students unprepared for college.

Last month, California formally shifted to the Common Core mathematics standards, which recommend that students delay taking algebra if they aren't ready for it. Previously, algebra class was a requirement for all eighth-graders in the state.

The Common Core State Standards Initiative, which is sponsored by the National Governor's Association, is an effort to unify diverse state education curricula. Forty-five other states and the District of Columbia have signed on so far.

But some education experts worry that the change will further damage struggling students' college chances, since early proficiency in Algebra I is an excellent predictor of college graduation, according to the Mercury News.

Black and Latino students in California are significantly more likely to fail eighth-grade algebra, and 80 percent of those who fail it once will fail it again when they take it in high school.

A study published by the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area claims that some minority students who score well enough to place into advanced math classes are often mistakenly held back.

Source
Does anyone find this ironic that the 2 groups of students with the highest rate of dropping out of school will be hurt the most by this.  Just another tool in the Progressive arsenal to keep Blacks and now Latinos on the Plantation.

Saturday, January 05, 2013

Feinstein: Domestic Enemy of the Constitution

"No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." (Thomas Jefferson, Proposal to Virginia Constitution, source) 
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (from Thomas Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," source)
"...to disarm the people - that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them." (George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 380, source

As a result of her actions against the Second Amendment rights of American citizens, Senator Dianne Feinstein has proven herself to be a domestic enemy of the Constitution of the United States.  Threats of this kind to our most basic rights are intolerable and the Constitution must be defended.  Feinstein has demonstrated a clear lack of understanding of our Constitution, which she has sworn to support and defend:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."  (Oath of a Congressman)
Who will now defend the Constitution and the rights of Americans?
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing."  -- Adolf Hitler, April 11 1942 (source)
The following list is taken directly from Senator Feinstein's website (Summary of Feinstein Legislation.pdf):
Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
  • 120 specifically-named firearms
  • Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
  • Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds
Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
  • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
  • Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test
  • Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans
Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
  • Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
  • Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and
  • Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
  • Background check of owner and any transferee;
  • Type and serial number of the firearm;
  • Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
  • Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
  • Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration
Feinstein's remarks from an interview in 1995 where she tells the reporter that she would take them all if she could get the votes (unclear whether she means all types of firearms or all types of "assault weapons"):


--Against All Enemies

Connect to AAE
   Blog: http://aaenemies.blogspot.com
   Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AgainstAllEnemies (Click "Like")
   Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/@AAEnemies ("Follow")
   YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/AAEnemies ("Subscribe")
Disclaimer: These opinions are solely my own, and do not reflect the opinions or official positions of any United States Government agency, organization or department.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Alabama Stands Against Agenda 21


Well done Alabama!  Another victory against Agenda 21, following the lead of places like the City of Colfax, California and the State of Tennessee.

ALABAMA TAKES A STAND AGAINST SOROS-BACKED ‘AGENDA 21’
Posted at The Blaze on June 8, 2012

Although the U.N.’s George Soros-backed plan for “Sustainable Development” (also known as “Agenda 21”) seems to have gone largely unnoticed by many Americans, the shadowy, backdoor attack on personal property rights didn’t slip past the people of Alabama.
“Alabama recently passed Senate Bill 477 unanimously in both of its houses. The legislation bars the taking of private property in Alabama without due process,” Investor’s Business Daily reports.

The bill specifically states the following:

Alabama and all political subdivisions may not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in or traceable to Agenda 21.

But let’s back up for a bit and talk more about “Agenda 21.” If you haven’t heard of it, you owe it to yourself to read up on it. Simply put, it’s an international initiative that overrides personal property rights all in the name of the environment and “sustainability.”  (more of the article at the link below)

Link to article: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/alabama-takes-a-stand-against-soros-backed-agenda-21/

Disclaimer: These opinions are solely my own, and do not reflect the opinions or official positions of any United States Government agency, organization or department.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Thomas Sowell on Public Golf and Poverty

Cross-posted by Maggie's Notebook

Thomas Sowell gets pithy on "Priceless Politics". Writing about the plight of San Francisco's municipal golf courses, Sowell asks the rhetorical questions we all ask about our city governments, and provides the obvious common-sense answers; obvious, that is, to all but politicians and bureaucrats.

Here's a quote from Sowell's Townhall.com piece to pique your interest:
Are the taxpayers being asked to support municipal golf courses so that the poor and the downtrodden can play? Not bloody likely.
As San Francisco's six municipal golf courses lose money, Sowell suggests:
If the golf courses are losing money, then get rid of them. Given San Francisco's sky high land prices, selling the land that the golf courses are on would bring in millions, if not billions, of dollars.
Sowell reports that "recent renovations" cost the city more than $23 million, and
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, "the city closed the gap with $16.6 million from state bond funds meant for recreation and park projects in underserved and economically disadvantaged areas." In other words, the poor have once again been used as human shields, this time to protect golfers.
The homeless cannot sleep on golf courses. Children cannot play in sand boxes, swing on swings, or teeter on totters on golf courses. Those earning below middle incomes do not play golf often. While you can picnic in a park seven days a week, weather permitting, most of modest means rarely play golf. Sowell:
Put bluntly, the poor are in effect being used as human shields in the political wars over government spending, which extends far beyond anyone who could even plausibly be called poor.

Politicians will spend money wherever that is likely to increase their chances of getting re-elected. Of all the things that governments spend money on, none is further removed from fighting poverty than municipal golf courses.
We see politicians at the City, State and Federal level sell their votes, every day, to a "few" at the expense of many, as their Prada wallets and Louis Vuitton handbags grow fatter. They have no shame. Read Sowell's entire piece at Townhall.com.

Then this snippet from yesterday's Christian Science Monitor:
A 2005 study by the University of California at San Diego, for the city of San Diego, found that the average street person in California costs communities between $40,000 and $150,000 a year in public services ranging from health care to police.
So, for those of us who appreciate lower greens fees, (and I, personally, have no disaffection for Louis Vuitton bags) but also want to do our part to care for the legitimately disabled, protect the mentally ill, and feed the children...what are we to do? $40,000-$150,000 PER YEAR, per the "average street person in California" - and this in temperate climates! Give us a break! Sigh.

Permalink for this entry:
http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/2007/02/thomas-sowell-on-public-golf-and.html

Trackback URL for this entry:
http://haloscan.com/tb/maggiesnotebook/792944537725622155


Technorati Tags:

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Taco Bell, Biodefense, and Illegal Immigration: You Connect the Dots

The Taco Bell food scare is over for now. It was the meat. No wait, it was the green onions. No revise that, it was the lettuce. No, well . . . “We just aren’t really sure.” But it’s over now . . . really it is, really . . well maybe . . .Ok, maybe not.

Recipe for National Disaster?

We have a nation consisting of a growing number of single individual households – working adults with little time or inclination to cook at home. Additionally more and more overworked Moms and Dads are opting to give their children fast food meals at least once a day. Many of our 20-40 something folks are into healthy living which often includes a preference for eating loads of dark leafy veggies and salads at the local salad bar. How many meals do you eat out daily? Can you afford to trust your very life to just any restaurant? Should you risk eating the fresh produce you purchase at the grocery store?

If you’ve got a strong stomach for bad news, you might like to read the December 11, 2006 article published in the New York Times, “Has Politics Contaminated the Food Supply?" by Eric Schlosser. Now I’m not arguing against these frightening stats, but Schlosser is convinced that the Democrats will save us on this one. Remember these are the same Democrats who appear to want an open border (anything crosses without a blink) virtual America.

Here are a few excerpts:

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 76 million Americans are sickened, 325,000 are hospitalized, and 5,000 die each year because of something they ate. . . .

Over the past 40 years, the industrialization and centralization of our food system has greatly magnified the potential for big outbreaks. Today only 13 slaughterhouses process the majority of the beef consumed by 300 million Americans . . .


Cutbacks in staff and budgets have reduced the number of food-safety inspections conducted by the F.D.A. to about 3,400 a year — from 35,000 in the 1970s. The number of inspectors at the Agriculture Department has declined to 7,500 from 9,000.

A study published in Consumer Reports last week showed the impact of such policies: 83 percent of the broiler chickens purchased at supermarkets nationwide were found to be contaminated with dangerous bacteria. . . .

Aside from undue corporate influence and inadequate financing, America’s food-safety system is hampered by overlapping bureaucracies. A dozen federal agencies now have some food safety oversight. The Agriculture Department is responsible for meat, poultry and some egg products, while the F.D.A. is responsible for just about everything else.

Ok it’s agreed, this should not be a partisan issue, but leave it to Schlosser to try to convince us all that it’s due to “undue corporate influence” (that’s code for Republican) and that the new Democratic Congress will “reverse a decades-long weakening of regulations and face up to the food-safety threats of the 21st century.” Please . . .

Does Schlosser, or any of the useful idiots on the left, even mention the impact of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION on the food industry????? In a word, NO.

The Schlosser article continues . . .

Last year, Representative Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut and Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois, both Democrats, introduced an important piece of food-safety legislation that tackles these problems. Their Safe Food Act would create a single food-safety agency with the authority to test widely for dangerous pathogens, demand recalls and penalize companies that knowingly sell contaminated food. . . .

The Safe Food Act deserves strong bipartisan backing. Aside from industry lobbyists and their Congressional allies, there is little public support for the right to sell contaminated food. Whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat, you still have to eat.

Read the opposition to the Safe Food Act. Basically it would pre-empt all state food safety regulations that are more stringent than federal standards.

Here are some interesting facts from Annys Shin of the Washington Post:

The number of produce-related outbreaks of food-borne illness has increased from about 40 in 1999 to 86 in 2004, according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Americans are now more likely to get sick from eating contaminated produce than from any other food item, the center said. . .

Several factors have contributed to the rise in outbreaks: greater consumption of fresh produce, especially cut fruits and vegetables; wider distribution; improved electronic reporting of outbreaks; and an aging population more susceptible to food-borne illness. . . .

E. coli O157:H7 has been a particular problem. Unlike the usually benign E. coli bacteria that live in warm-blooded animals and humans, the strain produces toxins that destroy the intestinal lining, leading to bloody diarrhea, kidney failure and, sometimes, death. . .

Although meat and dairy products are regulated by the Department of Agriculture, fruits and vegetables are the responsibility of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the states. But they have jurisdiction only over processing plants. Food safety at the farm level is largely self-regulated. . .

Much of the focus on how to improve standards is on California, where half the nation's fruits and vegetables are grown. . .

In October, executives of eight supermarket chains and distributors, including Safeway, Sysco, Wegmans and Kroger, sent a letter to growers and packers, demanding that they develop a food-safety program for lettuce and other leafy greens by Dec. 15. The program has been drafted but is still being reviewed by regulators. . . .

Ok, so let’s get this straight. Schlosser thinks that the solution will come from the short-sighted Democrats, who will save us all from corporate political corruption, which they would have us believe is the root cause of all failed food inspection. And the Democrat sponsored “Food Safety Act” would, in typical Democratic fashion, hack away at state’s rights and centralize all food inspection under another big-government bureaucracy. And although the biggest concern about food contamination is with produce-related outbreaks out of California where half the nation’s fruits and vegetables are grown and picked by immigrants, you haven’t read anything from the Dems about illegal immigration control in relation to food safety, now have you? And if corporate political corruption is the root of this evil, why is it that the food industry is demanding a food safety program?

Some Sickening Stats to Chew On

According to the CDC and USDA, food poisoning sickens 76 million people every year in the United States, sends 325,000 to the hospital, and kills 5,000.

The amount of imported horticulture products, meanwhile, has increased by 145 percent in the last decade, to $27 billion in 2005 from $11 billion in 1995, according to government statistics.

“Only 1% of imported products are ever inspected!” (KLIF Radio, Jeff Bolton, 12/14/06)

California’s agriculture contributes more than $28 billion annually to the state’s economy. This labor-intensive industry employs approximately one million people each year, most of whom are Mexican immigrants.

Here are some good reads that will turn anyone into a canned veggie eating homebody.

Illegals' presence deepens health concerns in food industry

Public health worries about illegal immigrants are reaching beyond hospitals and emergency rooms and could hit home in the restaurant and food-service sectors.

Undocumented immigrants are prevalent in the food-service industry, filling lower-paying, labor-intensive jobs such as bus boys, waiters, cooks, meat-cutters and food handlers.

That raises public health concerns among some lawmakers, including Scottsdale Congressman J.D. Hayworth and medical experts, because undocumented migrant workers often come from countries and regions with higher communicable disease rates. . .

Illegal Immigrants Are Spreading Dangerous Diseases Across This Nation

Illegal Immigration and Public Health

A Search for Terrorism in Illegal Immigration reveals 238 articles in a New York Times Topic Search.


Next update will include some little-known food/water disinfecting recipes.

Other Blogs that are discussing this:
Thirdway Blog , The Money Times, QDIS Blog , The Uncooperative Blogger , Sister Toldja
Follow faultlineusa on Twitter