Showing posts with label Daily Kos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daily Kos. Show all posts

Thursday, October 04, 2007

SCHIP: The S is for Socialized Medicine

“You have to wonder sometimes how Boehner and his Republican allies in the House can look at themselves in the mirror” – Daily Kos

“Well we don’t have to worry about these far, far lefties ever looking into the mirror. Like most social vampires, they cast no reflection!” – Faultline USA

Here’s an excerpt of ABC’s blather that passes for journalism these days.

. . .Gathering on the White House lawn and the steps of Congress, the throngs were joined by children who pulled red wagons filled with over a million petitions, urging Congress to expand health insurance coverage for children.

Yet, it appears that the effort may be in vain after Bush vetoed a bill on Wednesday that would have renewed and expanded SCHIP. . .

Health policy experts now say low and moderate income families like the Taylors will be hit the hardest if the veto stands, and individuals fear the social and financial consequences.

Congress has already passed legislation which would reauthorize and expand the program by adding $35 billion over five years, and covering an additional 4 million children — a plan funded by raising the federal cigarette tax by 61 cents to $1 per pack. . .

Sweets & Light has a great response to ABC’s blatant pandering to the left on the SCHIP veto.
Here’s an excerpt (but please go read all of it).

. . .Never mind that President Bush only vetoed a $35 billion dollar expansion of the SCHIP program. There is absolutely no reason to believe that this suddenly precious boondoggle (that most people had never even heard of before) will be eliminated. . .

. . .But just look at this exercise in objective journalism. See if you can find any mention of any possible objections to the SCHIP program. . .

Did ABC News speak to anyone except those who were benefiting from the taxpayers’ (unwitting) generosity? Did this reporter ask any hardworking families what they thought about paying for other peoples’ kids health insurance? . . .

. . .Unfortunately, every day we are fed an endless stream of execrable, agenda-driven articles like this one, masquerading as news. Articles so blatant in their purpose they would have even made Hitler or Stalin’s minions at their respective ministries of propaganda blush.

But because our watchdog media think they are serving such a noble purpose they are proud of their efforts rather than ashamed.

Of course that is exactly what they believed in Hitler and Stalin’s ministries as well.

Politico writers Kady II and O’Connor believe that an override veto is unlikely. . . Here’s an excerpt.

It’s highly unlikely any House Republican will turn 180 degrees and vote to override President Bush’s veto, but nonetheless, Democrats have decided to draw the issue out for two more weeks, until they hold the veto override.

Interviews with several of the targeted House Republicans — all of whom are considered vulnerable in next year’s elections and are under pressure to change their vote on State Children’s Health Insurance Program — give little indication that any of them would flip-flop on such a high-profile issue.

If an override passes, the Daily Kos confirms our worst fears with typical forked-tongue twisting. No I won’t hyperlink this far left nutcase blog. Here’s the link.

www(dot)dailykos(dot)com/storyonly/2007/10/4/81915/3035

Here’s an excerpt:

Which uninsured children are the wrong people? And who is this program intended to help?

This report provides an overview of citizen and noncitizen children in immigrant families in the United States and their access to SCHIP. The section entitled "Immigrant Children at Risk" describes the population, their rising numbers, and their lack of health insurance. The next section reviews the effects of the 1996 welfare reform law on immigrants' eligibility for health care, and studies that indicate enrollment is down even for eligible immigrant families. The report then examines some of the factors affecting enrollment, such as fears of public charge, verification of citizenship and immigrant status, and language and cultural barriers. Finally, the paper outlines examples of state responses through state-funded health care and improvements in outreach, application and enrollment. Examples from California, Texas, New Mexico and Florida are given. The appendices include definitions for common immigration terms and a description of federal funds available for outreach and enrollment to the immigrant population (SCHIP, Medicaid, and the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.)

. . . While Boehner appeals to Fortress America, state legislatures are trying to sign these eligible kids up, because we all pay for their care in ERs when they don't get care in a medical home. That's why 45 governors support SCHIP, from Jodi Rell (R-CT) to Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA).

You have to wonder sometimes how Boehner and his Republican allies in the House can look at themselves in the mirror.

Well we don’t have to worry about these far, far lefties looking into the mirror. Like most social vampires, they cast no reflection!




Tags: health care, politics, democrats, republicans, bush, senate, elections, news, republican, government

Trackposted to Perri Nelson's Website, Rosemary's Thoughts, DeMediacratic Nation, The Populist, Stuck On Stupid, Adeline and Hazel, Faultline USA, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Pirate's Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, High Desert Wanderer, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

The War Heats Inside the Democratic Party

According to Michael van der Galien of The Moderate Voice

There is something strange going on in the progressive blogosphere these days: instead of uniting against Republicans, progressive bloggers like Matt Stoller have decided to declare war on every Democrat who they consider not to be progressive (read anti-war) enough. . . .

Now they are admitting to what we’ve been saying all along! The following are articles Faultline USA posted earlier this year:

The Active Democrats Revolution . . . The key words “Active Democrat” are showing up in more and more new Political Action Committee names. The words are deliberately designed to link radical activists to the left-leaning P.A.C. that will represent their interests. . .

Extreme Left Hijacking Local Democratic Party Chairs . . . In the following days I will share with our readers actual examples (including names, dates, and places), of how the extreme left is actively hijacking local Democratic party executive committees and local chairs. . .
Democratic Left Cloaked in Religion and Patriotism . . . This is a continuation from yesterday’s introductory article, Extreme Left Hijacking Local Democratic Party Chairs. . .A well-orchestrated national strategy by the far left . . .

Obama Campaign Abusive to Blue Dogs . . . It's a sign of the times when Blue Dog Democrats have to leak stories to conservative bloggers because their own party has abandoned them. . .

Conservative Blogs Give Active Democrats Heartburn . . . Doesn’t it warm you heart to know that the far left is going into apoplexy over the fact that conservative bloggers are trying to keep them honest? Well, keeping them honest is quite an impossible task. But exposing them is a pleasure . . .

Will the Blue Dogs Vote with GOP? . . Starting with the left, Contentewire seems to think this is all some elaborate conspiracy between Blue Dog Democrats and Moderate Republicans . . .

Michael van der Galien continues:

. . .Seemingly frustrated that there are actually Democratic Congressmen that do not necessarily always vote along party lines - but make up their own minds - they have decided to ask their readers to make profiles of so-called “Bush Dogs” (Blue Dogs and New Democrats) as to be able to target them in the coming years, and to replace them with progressive, left-wing Republicans.

An example of a so-called Bush Dog they are targeting is Brian Baird. Baird opposed the war against Iraq from the get-go but believes that since the US went ahead and attacked anyway, it should persist and be successful. He believes that the surge might be paying off, at least to a degree, and that - therefore - the troops should not be withdrawn soon. So, Open Left and Daily Kos have decided to target Blair - they are writing negative posts about him, etc.
Of course, Baird is not the only victim. Once one pays attention to what is happening, one also sees that they are targeting
Hillary Clinton. Obviously not to replace her, but instead to make sure that she does not win the nomination. Besides attacking Hillary straight on, the left-wingers of the Daily Kos, Open Left and MyDD, also seem to have declared Bill Clinton their enemy. Their new best buddy? Al Franken.

Castro may or may not be Dead – Again

This from Memorandum

BREAKING: FIDEL CASTRO IS DEAD — My cellphone has not stopped ringing for the past ten minutes. Various sources inform that an announcement will come within the next few minutes from the Cuban government on Cuban TV and media. Stay tuned and we'll see if we've been manipulated once again …






a href="http://technorati.com/tag/left" rel="tag"> left

Related Technorati Tags: politics, democrats, politics, blogging, elections, news, media, crashing the gate, netroots moonbats, liberals, progressives, left wing extremists, left wing, lefties, the left, morons barack obama, clinton, 2008, hillary, barack, iraq, news, president

Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Big Dog's Weblog, Walls of the City, Shadowscope, Blue Star Chronicles, The Pink Flamingo, Leaning Straight Up, Phastidio.net, and , thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Conservative Blogs Give Active Democrats Heartburn

Doesn’t it warm you heart to know that the far left is going into apoplexy over the fact that conservative bloggers are trying to keep them honest? Well, keeping them honest is quite an impossible task. But exposing them is a pleasure.

This is a follow-up to my posts concerning how the lefty Netroots and Daily Kos folks and their so-called “Active” Democrats are attempting to take over moderate Democratic local party chairs, web sites etc.

The following was posted on the Wise County Active Democrat’s site at www(dot)wisedems(dot)org/ (No, I won't give these loony lefties free links!)

“How did Brenda Rankin's very distorted take on the March 5 CEC meeting in Parker County end up on the rightwing blog, Faultline USA? And from thence, to be gleefully featured on at least half a dozen rightwing blogs all throughout cyperspace, including the Conservative Index? It makes one wonder...

Perhaps Ms. Rankin would explain how Faultline got hold of her comments... Ms. Rankin?”

Well, Active Dems, perhaps Faultline USA can give you an answer. First, if you have read my articles you will note that Ms. Rankin was not the only moderate Democrat quoted. It would also appear that the moderate Democrats, whose reputations you are trying to destroy by outright lies and total fabrications, have found that the truth will never come out on your pirated web sites. And, by the way, do you have any idea of just how many “members” you actually have who are just lurking so they can read and pass along your “restricted” comments? By the way, why do you keep those comments restricted unless you have something to hide?

Here’s a hat tip to Conservative Index for keeping the story alive!

To learn more about how the radical left is undermining the Democratic Party on the local level read:
Obama Campaign Abusive to Blue Dogs
Democrats Attacked From Within
The Active Democrats Revolution
Extreme Left Hijacking Local Democratic Party Chairs
Democratic Left Cloaked in Religion and Patriotism

Top Blogs

Permalink to this post:
http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2007/04/conservative-blogs-give-active.html

Trackback URL:http://haloscan.com/tb/txwise/7905572107588088310

Technorati tags: politics, Blue Dogs, democrats, barack obama, barack, president, blogging, elections, 2006, news, media, crashing the gate, netroots

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Obama Campaign Abusive to Blue Dogs

It's a sign of the times when Blue Dog Democrats have to leak stories to conservative bloggers because their own party has abandoned them.

Wednesday a local Blue Dog Democratic party official was contacted by an Obama campaign worker asking for a donation. The local party official explained her position, and expressed concern that Obama was getting too much of his support from such leftist “grass roots” organizations as Democracy for America and Daily Kos. These organizations have gone out of their way to attack local party members and undermine local parties who don’t support their radical agenda.

The Blue Dog told the campaign worker that she would not support Obama as long as he supports these organizations. At that, the Obama campaign worker became angry and very abusive towards the Blue Dog.

Now you may think that some conservative, like me, just made up this story. But no, it’s a true story. It’s just a little insignificant story, but it’s in the very smallness of this story that the truth of the disintegration of the Democratic Party lays.

Legitimate news sources who wish to vet this story, which is probably being repeated in countless places across this country, may contact us at wakeupamerica(dot)spree(at)gmail(dot)com to facilitate contact with this Blue Dog Democratic party official.

I know that there are some conservatives who say, “So what? Why should we care? Let the Democrats eat their own. It’s better for us.”

Well, I don’t subscribe to that kind of thinking. Blue Dog Democrats are moderates who, for the most part, share many of our traditional American values. They are no more enamored with the left than are we conservatives. They understand the grave dangers the left poses to America’s unity and sovereignty. They are fearful, and with good reason, that the entire Democratic party will soon be completely controlled by the far radical left.

There are those running for office today that would sell their own souls, and would throw their own mothers from the bus, just to gain one more vote. They pander to dangerous anti-American radicals, hire foul-mouthed lying gutter snipes, and have no real concern about the future unity of this country. Nothing is beneath them in their quest for office. Some will succeed in gaining office, but they will never be American Patriots.

Wouldn’t this country be much better off if we had two not so polarized parties that could actually reason and negotiate with one another so that the work of congress would be more than a series of political shams and witch hunts? Don’t we Americans deserve more from congress?

Partisanship should never replace our loyalty to America and to our fellow loyal Americans.

Here’s an important quote about the dangers of political parties from a pretty smart fellow, an American Patriot, who had a remarkable insight into the future . . .

. . .All obstructions to the execution of the Laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They [political parties] serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels, and modified by mutual interests.

However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and to usurp for themselves the reins of government; destroying afterwards the very engines, which have lifted them to unjust dominion. . .
&
&
To learn more about how the radical left is undermining the Democratic Party on the local level read:
&
&
&
&
&

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Oprah’s Obama Launches White House Bid Today

Just in case you were under the misconception that Obama had already announced his White House intentions, Senator Barack Obama announces his bid for the White House today in Springfield, Illinois.

According to today’s thetimesonline.com it’s the social networking youth and the entertainment industry that gives Obama the strongest support.


Obama is widely popular on social networking web sites, such as
MySpace, where there is a coalition called "One Million Strong for Obama"
seeking to secure support for from a million youthful voters. . . .


Obama carries with him much support from the entertainment
industry. Calling him "my favorite senator," Oprah Winfrey has publicly pledged
her support. Mayor Richard M. Daley of Chicago also said he backs a run by
Obama. . .



Check out the new Obama 08’ site – very sophisticated.

By Joe Rospars - Feb 10th, 2007 at 2:18 am EST


About two hours after a midnight beta launch, the site is already
coming to life.
So far, so good. There's a team of nine of us, a few
content-types like me and some more geeky (in the good way) tech folks, sitting
on a conference call going through tiny tweaks and issues. Please let us know if
you run into any issues by
using the contact-us
form
and selecting the "reporting a technical problem" in from the
drop-down.


The site is already brimming with groups, blogs, fundraising pages,
and events. Getting started early are
Idahoans for
Obama
and South
Carolinians for Obama
, just to name a few of the many newly-created
groups
. . .


Just for fun. Take the Daily Kos poll “Who Supports Barack Obama?”
Note: Hillary isn’t doing too well with the Daily Kos folks on this poll so far.

There’s a new forum, Obamanet.com that hasn’t gotten much attention yet. Pretty Short on discussion.





Follow faultlineusa on Twitter