With US secondary school students lagging behind many other
nations in educational performance, combating this with a voluntary education
initiative developed and operated by the states received much favorable
attention.
The Common Core State Standards Initiative “seeks to
establish consistent educational standards [in English Language Arts and
Mathematics] across the states as well as ensure that students graduating from
high school are prepared to enter credit-bearing courses at two- or four-year
college programs or enter the workforce,” according to the Common Core State
Standards Initiative Website.
At one point 45 of the 50 states had signed up. But as time passed
and the program evolved, 17 states have seen things that have caused them to
adopt the language standards but not the math standards, to question the
program generally, or to drop out altogether.
The most recent to bail out is Oklahoma, following the lead of
Indiana in March, followed just days before Oklahoma’s exit last week by South
Carolina.
“We are capable of developing our own Oklahoma academic
standards that will be better than Common Core,” Governor Mary Fallin said in a
statement released by her office. “Unfortunately, federal overreach has tainted
Common Core. President Obama and Washington bureaucrats have usurped Common
Core in an attempt to influence state education standards.”
She continued: “What should have been a bipartisan policy is
now widely regarded as the president’s plan to establish federal control of
curricula, testing and teaching strategies.” Oklahoma will return to the
standards previously in place, and develop new standards aimed at meeting the
needs of industry and academia.
In South Carolina, Governor Nikki Haley signed legislation
that requires a committee to review and implement a new set of academic
standards by the 2015-16 school year, and return to the former assessment tests
by 2014-15.
In a letter supporting the legislation, Gov. Haley said the
following: “South Carolina’s educational system has at times faced challenges …
that cannot be solved by increasing our dependence on federal dollars and the
mandates that come with them. Just as we should not relinquish control of
education to the Federal government, neither should we cede it to the consensus
of other states.”
As an early supporter of Common Core, Indiana’s recent
rejection is seen as pivotal, perhaps encouraging other states to abandon the
program, as well. What drove the Hoosiers away? Growing criticism over costs
imposed by the program, and concerns that eventually it would evolve into a
national education standard.
Stating Indiana’s thinking on the subject, Governor Mike
Pence said, “I believe our students are best served when decisions about
education are made at the state and local level. By signing this legislation,
Indiana has taken an important step forward in developing academic standards
that are written by Hoosiers, for Hoosiers, and are uncommonly high, and I
commend members of the General Assembly for their support.”
Missouri reportedly also has legislation to withdraw awaiting
approval by governor Jay Nixon. And North Carolina is moving in that direction.
Complaints from North Carolina parents over the unfamiliar
material and believing the standards to be an intrusion by the federal
government prompted legislative action that would maintain state control over education standards. Both houses of the legislature
have approved measures to replace Common Core standards with new ones to be
created by an appointed commission.
These two measures must be reconciled and submitted to
Governor Pat McCrory, who has expressed support for Common Core, before the
withdrawal will be complete. The measures passed each house by margins that
could override a veto. Alaska, Nebraska, Texas, and Virginia also are resisting
the program.
This resistance actually began several years ago, just after
the standards were developed in 2009. Five members of the 30-person Common Core
validation committee refused to sign on to the standards, two of whom are
experts in content: Stanford University’s James Milgram, professor emeritus of
mathematics, and the University of Arkansas’ Sandra Stotsky, professor of
education reform emerita and co-author of Massachusetts’ highly regarded ELA
standards.
When 17 percent of the committee doesn’t support the
standards the committee designed, that signals trouble in paradise.
These rejections reveal two important things. First, these
17 states recognize Common Core is something different than what they were led
to believe it would be, and objections to some specific content and methods
arose, convincing some states that they can do better. And, second, these
states are resisting the statist, authoritarian federal government, and its “Washington
knows best,” one-size-fits-all approach.
Back in the day, when the American education system was
doing a great job of educating young people, state, county and local school
systems bore responsibility for deciding what goals were important and how to
achieve them. Somehow, without the central planning of the federal government,
American high school graduates managed to be well prepared for the next step in
their lives.
America does best when Americans are left to think for
themselves and to make decisions and follow the course that best suit their
purposes. It’s called “freedom,” and once was the hallmark of our nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment